2 years ago
Online Dating After Divorce
  • Posted Feb 16, 2016

image

After a divorce, you may be anxious to get back into the dating field to fill the void left by your spouse. To have the greatest success in returning to the dating world, it is important to be properly prepared both mentally and physically.

PREPARATION

Step 1: Don’t begin dating until your divorce is final. A lot of emotions are draining you during a divorce, including disbelief, anger, confusion, and maybe even relief. This is not the time to jump back into the dating field. Wait for your divorce to be finalized and that you’ve had time to properly grieve, reflect, and accept the divorce. Then move onto the next step.

Step 2: Make changes to your life. A divorce gives you the great opportunity to improve your lifestyle and yourself, leaving you time to do things like find a Sugar Baby. Before running out to start dating, take the time to make a list of things you can do to improve your image, self-esteem, and look.

Think about why your marriage didn’t succeed and take the elements you were weak at and make them your strengths. For example, maybe you were a slob. Take the time to change your habits. Research ways to turn a bad habit into a good one then take action daily. And stick to it!

Also consider making changes to the way you look to improve the way you feel. If you are obese then take the time to lose weight. One of the best ways to lose weight is to give up soda for water, walk at least an hour a day, and eat more fruits/vegetables instead of processed foods. Remember that as your image and health improves, your self-esteem will improve too.

Step 3: Don’t let your family and friends push you into dating too soon. Take your time to be completely ready before you reenter the dating field. This will be done on your terms and not someone else’s terms

ONLINE DATING TIPS

You’ve completed the first three steps and you’re ready to give online dating a try again. Congratulations! Because you’ve taken the time to improve yourself you will have a fresher and more positive outlook on the direction your life is going. Here are some tips for getting back into the dating scene via online dating:

Step 1: Approach it realistically. There’s nothing “magical” about online dating. You are simply trying to meet some like-minded people to date. In general you will get out of online dating what you put into it.

Step 2: Spend time on your profile and let her know exactly what type of arrangement you seek. Because you’ve taken the time to get into better shape and increase your self-esteem, you should have no problems posting photos of yourself. Research shows that profiles with photos get a lot more interaction than profiles without photos. Be sure to smile in your photos. When it comes to writing your profile be sure to be positive and fun. People want to date someone who is positive and outgoing, not someone who is negative and down on life.

Step 3: Don’t be afraid to put yourself out there. The goal of online dating is to go on dates to see who turns your life upside down in a good way. Research shows that you should go on a first date within 17-23 days of meeting the person online. Anything longer is likely to create “assumptions” and “idealizations” from you and the person you are communicating with.

Step 4: Be a great date, and understand what it means to be a Sugar Daddy. Study past communications to come up with questions to ask your date. Be yourself, be positive, and be fun. Avoid discussions of politics, exes, and religion (unless you meet on a religious site). Avoid negative conversations like “what did you think of that terrorist attack? Isn’t that horrible?” You want to keep your conversations more fun and light-hearted. Listen carefully to your date so that you can ask follow-up questions based on what they talk about.
Online dating is a great way to start the next chapter of your life after a divorce. You may have a few bad communications or dates, but don’t let that get you down. When you meet that person that is “perfect” for you, your life will get even better.

Leave a Reply

2,061 Responses to “Online Dating After Divorce”

  1. Jo anna says:

    I don’t see anything wrong with a man seeking casual dating (or whatever he’s looking for) after a divorce. We all have a past and as long as you’re not ONLY talking about your ex, it’s a good way to bond and get to know each other. I love learning about a mans past. It says alot about them as a person

  2. Psychokiller says:

    If you are a single divorced mature man you don’t need a SB. There is a vast ocean of available, willing 35+ that are starving for a decent guy. Pussy literally falls from the sky at my age. Women are far more aggressive and sexual than when I was in my 20’s

  3. SweetYoungNatalia says:

    Everyone needs a little loving! Meet new people and start from the bottom again. Some people may need emotional bonding after a divorce and I think SA is a perfect site to meet new beautiful young people.

  4. Letsgojasmine says:

    Im guessing after a divorce, an SD should seek counseling to get rid of his past tramas and then afterwards, he should be fine :)

  5. Basri says:

    Divorced woman contact me!

    • Anonymous says:

      Why not? Divorce isn’t bad enough. What could be worse? Yes right human trafficking and the slave trade. What was I thinking?

  6. Anonymous says:

    wow, I got blocked

  7. Anonymous says:

    I wonder why SA hasn’t put out a new blog already.

  8. how’s my new avatar ?

  9. The Real Dave says:

    check out the cougar life commercial

    YouTube / aAmZwtSFHB8

    this will drive Elaine and the nazis nuts !

  10. The Real Dave says:

    sometimes I think feminazis are obsessed with rape becuase they possibly subconsciously enjoy it .

    • Anonymous says:

      How can anybody enjoy rape you idiot? The word itself is negating that meaning. Fucking low life loser

      • A Nonnymouse says:

        Well, he enjoys it. And also enjoys sucking prople into responding…which you did anon.

        He just made you do what he wanted, didn’t he?

  11. The Real Dave says:

    @tvc is here .. watch the rape accusations skyrocket ..

    • Fundude says:

      She didn’t last very long on the sugar reddit.

      She couldn’t provide any productive discussions because she is basically worthless with only shaming language.

      Hence, the lemons have come back to this blog. Didn’t take long. Elaine deleted her account over there too.

      • Anonymous says:

        You didn’t last there either.

      • TVC15 says:

        It’s not my fault you’re fat. You need to cut out the dairy, wheat and sugar. Stop blaming everyone else for your problems and your lack of self-control.

      • Fundude says:

        Thats true but I wasn’t really trying to last there either or make some production about how I was leaving lol.

        TVC’s dumbass is already back because they won’t tolerate her angry feminist SB bullshit.

        Elaine’s methods of trying to shame the younger SBs into avoiding older SDs didn’t work either.

        Actually, I have a fond remembrance for that reddit lol

      • Anonymous says:

        Your fat is not a feminist issue. It’s everyone’s problem.

      • Anonymous says:

        Hey Fundude, since you’re so fond of links, why don’t you give us the links of what Elaine posted there?

      • The Real Dave says:

        when TVC has a lot of gas that means she was raped by a jalapeño bean entree she ordered at Taco Bell . rape ! rape ! rape ! rape ! now say it 15 times everyone

      • A Nonnymouse says:

        Just curious davey boy.

        When one of those women you admitted raping gets a bit older. Don’t you worry that she’s going to get together with one of those feminazi lawyers, use your admissions here, and take you to court. Even if you win it’s going to cost you.

        One of the others brought it up a while back, but you didn’t have an answer.

        It’s you bragging about rape that’s going to be dragging on the court time too. :)

      • Promise says:

        FunDude, leave Elaine alone .

      • I don’t answer because you started your question with the assumption that I raped someone . nobody has been raped so there’s nothing to answer

      • TVC15 says:

        Says the rapist.

      • @ TVC .. Count 1 ; 14 more “RAPE” screams to go.

      • A Nonnymouse says:

        Davey davey, you miss the point.

        A). You made admissions here that the girl could take to a prosecutor.

        B). There’s plenty of feminazi prosecutors out there looking for guys like you.

        C). Even if you get off, it’ll cost you near enough to $100k in lawyering.

        D). That girl only has to join those dots…the feminazi prosecutor will do the rest.

        Of course, if you think a feminist prosecutor wouldn’t be interested, you’re ok. Haha.

  12. Another anonymous says:

    @ YGBKM

    Good afternoon, did you keep that third X?

    • yougottabekiddingme says:

      What I think I hear you saying is that you miss me. Youve been a good sport, AA. I could see myself missing you, too…kinda, at some point, maybe, possibly.

      Third x was a play on words and context.

      sexxxy, huh?

      Have you successfully avoided racial profiling so far today? I certainly hope so!

      Am busy for the next few little bit. Play with ya later :)

      • Another anonymous says:

        @ YGBKM

        Did you look at the clinical description of people with real clinical Triple X syndrome? I was tempted to post it here, but that is a bit insensitive to real patients even by the corny standards of this page.

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        You’re almost there, AA. Keep at it.

        Re-read the post to which I responded, and perhaps you’ll see the tie-in.

        Ive not completely given up on you, but this friendship is off to a rather tiresome start.

      • Another anonymous says:

        @ YGBKM

        Will do later, kinda busy day today.

  13. Another Anonymous says:

    @ TVC15

    If people were about as fat as FD the clinical problem of obesity would disappear. Let us first worry about Michael Moore, his obesity and his comments about the price of healthcare in this country. The best of course was Michael Moore and Oprah Winfrey discussing the price of healthcare.

  14. Fundude says:

    Alpha Male bodybuilder tells fat women to stop their bullshit fat acceptance movement

    {{http://www.lift-run-bang.com/2016/03/fuck-your-body-positivity-voice-and.html}}

    • Anonymous says:

      Bodybuilding isn’t healthy either, as neither is fat. Especially the taking of steroids and other supplements.

      • Anonymous says:

        Look idiot, most bodybuilders don’t use steroids. You can stop crying now

      • Fundude says:

        I agree that many bodybuilders are unhealthy due to steroid abuse/HGH/etc.

        However, that doesn’t mean we should promote obesity.

        If we want “realistic” models for both sexes, I would be fine with that. However, there is no equivalent fat acceptance movement for men.

        Its all about excessive jacked action figures (same as romance novels) for men but out of shape fat slob women.

      • Anonymous says:

        Realistic is as realistic does. Google tells us this statistic:

        Childhood Overweight and Obesity in the U.S. About a quarter of 2-5 year olds and one-third of school-age children (including adolescents) are overweight or obese in the U.S. (Ogden et al., 2014). About 30 percent of low-income preschoolers are overweight or obese

      • Anonymous says:

        So most of our kids are sick and there’s an epidemic of obesity. This shows even more that we need to get better models out there. Realizing that most of your society is sick and then only encouraging it is called suicide

    • TVC15 says:

      This is pretty rich, since it’s coming from a fat bodybuilder.

  15. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Being single

    That definition can use an improvement. Some continental European countries reserve single for somebody NEVER married. After that you can be married, separated, divorced, widowed but never single again.

    • Jaybird923 says:

      Same thing in the USA people just choose to do what they want but the same classifications apply. If single and divorce were meant to be interchangeable they wouldn’t list both on dating websites.

      • A Nonnymouse says:

        Yeah, it’s like some people call themselves alphas, when everyone else calls them douche bags. It’s almost to the point where the terms are interchangeable. 😉

  16. Fundude says:

    Tommy Sotomayor puts black American women on blast (should be all Western women):

    {{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaRMeAByce4}}

    Jaybird, he’s got a great point woman.

  17. Jaybird923 says:

    @Another your evidence. …

    That poster has some great posts.
    Stuff about TUMBLR SBs, House income stats considering allowances, ideal age ranges, etc.
    Analytical thought process that definitely adds significant value to this blog.

    [–]justforsugarSugar Baby 15 points 5 days ago
    “That poster” is black and one of our moderators, so if your post history has anything to say about your character, sir, you are a sad, sad person. Please, please go elsewhere.
    You add NO discernable value to this sub. Hint: It’s not a blog. You came from a blog, unfortunately. Please go back.
    Red Pillers and race-baiters are not going to be well-received here. My analysis of you indicates that you are both ego-driven and racist, with a gender bias that is most comfortable with other sad little men under a bridge, brah.
    I know I’m about to get nicked by our mods, and it isn’t my place to call out someone, but I just can’t tolerate your mindset for one more minute. I’m even going to tag the mods so they can warn me themselves. /u/mercilette /u/malibijones /u/ph1shtaco To quote just ONE of your comments directly, from a month ago.
    . This pussy became “disabled” from PTSD despite never seeing combat in Iraq. He is a house husband that is totally controlled by his used goods/feminist wife. Im sure she got dicked down by black/brown men before he met her. He was cucked before he was even married. Can’t take this beta faggot seriously brah.

    [–]coolcat1226[S] -5 points 5 days ago
    Considering I said that to a White Nazi making fun of him in the most nasty of manner on some other blog, I fail to see how this is relevant to the sugar blog.
    I stand by my diss on that dude though.
    He is a Nazi PTSD guy who lives off the govt and his angry feminist WN wife while making fun of blacks/Jews/etc and calls them “parasites”.
    if you want to go defend him, go join up the Nazi crew.

  18. The Real Dave says:

    if being a modern day single mom was so great the women on SA wouldn’t choose the “prefer not to say” option when it comes to disclosing the number of bastard offspring they have running around . Apparently they put too much stock in MTVs single mom shows.

    • Anonymous says:

      Don’t talk about children like that, they’re not ‘bastard offspring’ they have a mother and a father who are separated/divorced.

      • Fundude says:

        No they are by definition bastard children born out of wedlock for the most part.

        Look up the dictionary definition of bastard

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        Ive seen “prefer not to say” on quite a few SD profiles. Am thinking it’s more a matter of discretion/none of your or the world’s business/theyd simply prefer not to discuss their children? I generally regard the topic of children as privy, and would never open the conversation with a potential even if he’s listed the number of children he has. If he has “prefer not to say,” I presume that he has children, and will allow him to disclose if he so chooses. Also, I think that some list “zero” children for the same reason. Not sure, Real Genius, why you gather that the only reason a woman would select “Prefer not to say” would be to shy away from her conspicuous bastard children.

        You’ll probably say (in a high-pitched voice), “It IS my business if I’m gonna be scamming these bitches.”

        You’re a real gem.

      • The Real Dave says:

        a single dad on this site has value . he makes money and he takes care of a child . a single mom on this site is 90% of the time broke and a train wreck looking for a handout because she reproduced with a loser

      • Anonymous says:

        I wasn’t talking about children born out of wedlock but children with divorced or separated parents. Children born out of wedlock are called that, but this isn’t the 1950’s and we aren’t abiding the fairytale book called the Bible or the church anymore. Get in the 2016 bandwagon. Almost everyone these days is marrying by simply living together, not by signing a contract.

      • Anonymous says:

        “a single mom on this site is 90% of the time broke and a train wreck looking for a handout because she reproduced with a loser”

        Usually it’s because women don’t know how to handle money. Just listen to them on this site say things like “omg you can’t live on 4K a month”
        They could probably still choose losers but if they made the right educational and economic decisions they could still be ok. Most don’t though because they have no concept for numbers

      • Anonymous says:

        And anonymous you saying shit doesn’t make it true. “Most” people still go to church and still get married the traditional way. People aren’t as stupid as you think they are where if you say it people will do it. No people will do what they were raised to do and what they believe in

      • Anonymous says:

        Of course religious nuts are gonna be everywhere in this day and age too. I thought people had more common sense. I guess we need to wait for a revolution, a transition by probably around 2020.
        However, I was not talking about religious marriage, which I don’t consider at all in my book, I was talking about legal marriage with a contract and a factic marriage whereas the couple have been living together without signing the document that binds them.

      • Anonymous says:

        Because a person goes to church doesn’t make them a religious nut. Getting married the traditional way doesn’t even mean specifically getting married in a church either. I get your definition but “most” people are still not doing it that way. Albeit too many are though and that’s why we have a ridiculously high number of single mothers and children without fathers. Are the single mothers happy? No they’re miserable and barely making it so I guess your way isn’t working out that great lol

      • Anonymous says:

        The kids aren’t that happy either. We have the highest rate of kids under 14 committing suicide than history has ever seen

    • The Real Deal says:

      You must be the original bastard. A bastard does’t come from a Mom she why your here, You Ass. You the bastard must always experience emotions like envy, self pity, bitterness and resentfulness. You poor Bastard.

  19. Anonymous says:

    SA has possibly removed the ability to download pics, I am sure there are third party tools. But currently using the snipping tool.

  20. Anonymous says:

    Why is there shit like Whiny, Dramatic and Princess on my Snickers bars???? WTF ????

  21. Fundude says:

    @Dave

    RooshV followers talking about seeking arrangement “game”

    {{https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-21493.html}}

    Might give you some extra manipulation points that these dudes appear to have perfected lol

    • Anonymous says:

      More links from the guy who never posts links lol

    • The Real Dave says:

      ok I never noticed that article . for centuries men have tried giving advice to other men about women . it’s like selling snake oil . some guys I know who joined SA say they feel like scamming the bitchy ones or ones that message them asking for money on the first date . I encourage it for some good old fashioned revenge purposes but it’s not a long term strategy .

      • Fundude says:

        Most men are on SA to get pussy not some “long term love interest”.

        Ergo, rooshv tactics are probably quite appropriate for this venue.

      • Anonymous says:

        Unfortunately men have to wait because most have decided to go platonic. Good for them

      • Fundude says:

        Most are definitely not platonic after a month on SA.

        If they are truly “platonic” they usually just delete their profile in a few weeks due to lack of any real money vs effort.

      • Anonymous says:

        Actually, thanks for posting that. It helps SB’s be more aware of scammers and their tactics.

        About the only decent thing u have posted as yet.

  22. Fundude says:

    Vegan Gains destroys feminists:

    {{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PJtrVC44fE}}

  23. Another Anonymous says:

    @Dave

    She was also right with getting the third X. She fits that perfectly.

  24. The Real Dave says:

    @ yougottabefeedingme you finally posted an avatar of your true love interest .

  25. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Jay

    Unfortunatelly this is not a forum for rational discussion. A good start is the work of Jake Horowitz. And I would be happy to discuss it, just without the bizarre irrational comments of YGBKM.

  26. yougottabekiddingme says:

    welp…

    Ive spent enough time playing with you guys today. Should be playing with myself…maybe make room for a friend.

    soon again 😀

  27. Another Anonymous says:

    @YBGKM

    Well it is not easy, but you made me speechless. You have asked for at least one example of an area where a minority police force is able to profile a white man. I provided two examples, both with personal experience of being profiled and your response is a link to what appears to be an introduction to research from Colorado state university. So I give up.

    • yougottabekiddingme says:

      yes, AA…very rudimentary principles.

      There is nothing more I can do here.

      I concede to your victory.

      Congratulations.

  28. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Anonymous

    You are probably right. But in general I do not understand this whole argument about profiling. I was a “victim” of it both in Hawaii and in Japan. Meaning the police officer stopped me, told me they were looking for a white suspect, I showed them my documents, explained my presence and activities and that was it.

    See I do not have tribal feelings. If there is a white male perpetrator, I want him in court. I have no intention to shield him from Asian police officer just because he is Caucasian.

  29. The Real Dave says:

    @ nonnymouse.
    you’re confusing what I say with ideology . I only state action/reaction . I don’t believe in PUA or all of the red pill ideology . PUA is bullshit . I realize that either women are attracted to me or not . an older man should be provide financially for a LADY. I stress LADY. none of you are ladies . your mostly trash . the
    way you feminazis act , you deserve to be scammed. you state women can also rinse . now it becomes a war of attrition . a woman can only rinse for 12 years from the age of 18 to 30. after that no man is willing to lose money on old hags . a man can be a scammer and manipulator from the age of 18 to age 50 . time is on our side not yours .
    feminism taught you that you have power equal to a man. you never have and you still don’t after 3rd wave feminism . so like I said its a war of attrition and you can’t skirt nature .

    • Anonymous says:

      your typical nerd guy with no game that plays the ole biology card early, and often. That is all those types have to play :(

      • biology cannot be defeated. It is not a card or a belief, it is nature . Time is on men’s side.

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzcWwmwChVE]

      • Anonymous says:

        of course that is why you are on this site paying or pretending to pay women to go near you bc time is on your side. not money or the promise of it.

      • The Real Dave says:

        my dear you made my point for me … I can keep promising the money into my 50s. a woma promising her pussy past age 35 is comical .

      • Anonymous says:

        So is a 20 year old guy. idiot. But the fact won’t change, women aren’t attracted to men in their 50s or 60s. Now YOU CAN’T CHANGE THAT!

      • FatB'StardSA says:

        @Anon

        Why should a guy care if a woman is “attracted” to him. the only thing that matters is if she sleeps with him.

        Have a nice day :-).

    • Fundude says:

      Correct analysis on the aging issue.

      Old feminists like TVC won’t like that reality but tough shit for them.

    • Fundude says:

      PUA is bullshit that guys like Roosh try to peddle for dollars.

      Red pill is mostly the stuff you have been saying. Red Pill just talks about sexual dynamics of the modern female that is very accurate in analysis.

      It has some good stuff on the redpill subreddit if you can get past some of the dudebro early 20s frat boys that think fanciful bragging online makes them feel “alpha”.

      Kinda like the male versions of DamnVixen or Elaine

      • Jaybird923 says:

        “It has some good stuff on the redpill subreddit if you can get past some of the dudebro early 20s frat boys that think fanciful bragging online makes them feel “alpha”.”

        ROTFLMAO the funniest shit you’ve ever said on the blog. Oh god the irony lol

      • Fundude says:

        How so?

        I rarely speak about myself to brag or give fanciful stories about coke filled parties after selling a company for a billion dollars or some other nonsense.

        Kinda like the sugar forum blog.

      • Jaybird923 says:

        “I rarely speak about myself to brag…”

        ROTFLMAO Fundude my luv you are on a roll

      • Fundude says:

        What have I bragged about unless attacked by morons on here?

      • The Real Dave says:

        @fundude … yeah Roosh recently started asking for money . he claims writing the blog makes him little money but he and his staff write articles about SMV . he’s full of crap . he’s after attention though I bet initially he wrote amount of frustration and angst . they talk about “game” and remove money from the smv equation . you can’t . we both know that . if you throw in money with obtaining the highest value women then you equate game with prostitution , so red pill and ROK try to only whisper about money . we both know it’s the elephant in the room .

      • Fundude says:

        @Dave

        Redpill reddit speaks incessantly about “money” and “physique” as essential to improve your SMV. Even Roosh states this.

        I agree with this to a large degree.

        Males status is largely determined by social dominance. This includes wealth/status/often physique.

        Roosh is just trying to make more money by pushing the “game” bullshit. The only thing that works in game is confidence to a certain degree and ability to hold a conversation without a female pushing you around.

        The rest of game is just for socially awkward nerds to get taken advantage of by Roosh.

      • The Real Dave says:

        @fundude most of the game articles talk about everything but money . one of their so called pick up artists , Troy Francis claims he met a French girl on the street and fvcked her 15 minutes later . they never talk about going on dates or this site at all or being a sugar daddy . most of the readers are in their 20s

    • Anonymous says:

      Maybe we should speed up the process of the 5th wave then which involves your castration. Say goodbye to your teeny weeny, it wasn’t of much use anyways.

  30. Another Anonymous says:

    @ YGBKM

    Domestic example – non tourist parts of Hawaii, specifically Leeward part of Oahu. Honolulu County police in general is only 13.3 percent Caucasian.

    International example – any smaller community in Japan, for example Naha and Nago with relatively small and profoundly unpopular US military personnel population

  31. Another Anonymous says:

    @ YGBKM

    Would you call me a racist if I take your post and instead of white men venturing out of boondocks, it would talk about confused black women venturing outside of ghetto?

    • yougottabekiddingme says:

      Do you have a hard-on right now? Stick it in the pot, and stir it some more, why dontcha?

      Perhaps Promise can answer your question. Dont let her fare legs fool you. She has the virginal soul of a black woman, apparently. Didnt think there was such a thing did ya?

      On second thought…she would likely be lost where ever she happens to venture.

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        Further…

        If you could be ever so kind in providing me an example of a predominately minority police force capable of profiling a white man in any city or town anywhere ever, Ill shut my cock-ready mouth.

        Then again, that probably wouldnt stop me being that Ive perfected the art of not-so-profoundly choking on a cock while typing.

        Talent 😉

      • Jaybird923 says:

        LMAO Now that’s what I call multi tasking! You my dear must command top dollar.

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        Lol. A girl must know her worth :p

    • Fundude says:

      Your wasting your time attempting to inject logic with angry feminist women.

      Logic + feminist women= no go together.

      • Anonymous says:

        Let’s face it. Almost all women have trouble with logic. Their brains are wired in a twist

      • Jaybird923 says:

        Us no know logic good. Us have two x chromosomes duh…

      • Anonymous says:

        Twisted contorted brains makes for better choking on cocks in a corkscrew twisty fashion while typing. There is method to the madness Ya dig

      • Jaybird923 says:

        LMAO we not all can do that. Only YGTBKM her expert. Maybe us not all have twisted brain?

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        “Us no know logic good. Us have two x chromosomes duh…”

        LMAO

        i think i just laughed myself a third x

        gonna command for top dollar now, for sure

  32. The Real Dave says:

    uh oh there we have it , dissension in the Social Justice Warrior ranks. the political correct police force cannot figure out which cause to take up. feminism or racism ? or homophobia? yet at any given time the females here will show signs or apparent anti male, anti white , anti black, and make disparaging remarks about gays when it suits their agenda. must be a sad world in the brain of a modern day fvcked up female .

  33. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Jay

    Well that is because white males are usually majority. A brief trip out of a country and white males can easily be on receiving end of racial profiling.

    • yougottabekiddingme says:

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

      Yeah, they are suspected of crimes far more often than the deer.

      It’s just not fair!!!

      • Anonymous says:

        I hope he meant outside of his home country and not literally the country or boondocks.

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        Yes, good point. I might have misread. Yes, white men venturing outside of the country, boondocks or predominately white neighborhood are very likely to be profiled. People will assume they are lost, and attempt to give them directions….or steal their wallet, depending on who ya ask.

    • Anonymous says:

      If they go to Afghan the fuckin stan then yes.

  34. problem is says:

    Think it is amazing that “ignorant” is derived from “ignore”, but the latter is seldom utilized in reference to the former!
    Now who has my wallet!?!

  35. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Jay

    Actually for me it was a different thing. I do not like to make judgements based on rumours. So I just asked for a quote of what he said as an evidence to discuss. Instead of that I got small minded jerks yelling at me, that only a bully or a person with low intelligence would ask for evidence. The typical mentality of lynch mob. And up until now those cowards cannot even say a simple: “I was wrong, FD did not write a racist comment.” Well, no big deal, good riddance if they do not want to talk to me.

    • Anonymous says:

      You should seriously get over your obsession with this ridiculous matter. For a supposed male, You are making more drama out of this non-issue than one the real housewives or kartrashian shows. .

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        I trust Jay’s word that FunDude did not write a racist comment on the reddit blog. His racist antics demonstrated here should not be retroactively used against him.

    • Anonymous says:

      @FunDude racial baits. I just read where he accused another blogger of allowing white feminists to shit on her, like someone else said below which is just as bad or much worse imo

  36. yougottabekiddingme says:

    Youre on to something here.

    I wonder if drug dealers ever profile themselves.

    Wonder if they would hand a stranger their wallet, and if theyd profile which strangers theyd hand their wallets.

    Do drug dealers even carry wallets?

    Am I stereotyping by asking that question?

    Assuming that drug dealers carry wallets…

    I wonder if they profiled a stranger to hand their wallet, if the profiled stranger would steal the wallet, and then profile a drug dealer from whom theyd buy drugs with money from their newly acquired wallet.

    And if the profiled stranger who stole the wallet from one drug dealer to buy drugs from a different, profiled drug dealer, would Al Sharpton would step in to condemn said profiling?

    Any other spin you care to add? The possibilities are endless.

  37. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Jay

    Well yes, reputation. So if one has a reputation of a drug dealer, he will be a prime suspect in the next investigation. But he still should ger a fair trial. Perfect logic.

    Problem is that the same logic applied to population level is a racial profiling. If vast majority of drug dealers in the city are Hispanic, the police will obviously look harder at any Hispanic. A textbook case of racial profiling.

    • Fundude says:

      Logic and Jaybird lol

    • Jaybird923 says:

      Of course he should get a fare trial that was never a question. What we were discussing was why it was so easy for so many people to believe he was guilty even though they had no proof. They did so because of the reputation that he intentionally cultivated.

      profiling is a useful law enforcement tool when used without personal bias. Just like whenever there’s a serial killer on the loose FBI thinks white male. The difference between that and what happens to other races is that the police doesn’t stop every white male whether a crime as been committed or not simply because he is a white male.

      That is where the problem with profiling lies and what renders it harmful and ineffective

  38. ANONNN says:

    Hi, I’m first time sugar baby. I’m supposed to be meeting with a potential sugar daddy tomorrow. We have only been talking for a day and he wants us to meet up for coffee in the morning? Also he offered to take care of my transport but it’s not far from me so I wanna tell him not to worry about it? Should I be worried that he wants us to meet so quickly and in the morning as well? Also I have no idea what to wear to a morning coffee date.. haha never been on one before. Any other tips for a new SB will be greatly appreciated

    • Anonymous says:

      He probably just doesn’t want to waste a lot of time texting and talking. Meeting in person in a coffee shop doesn’t take much time for either person and it is a good way to see if you might be a match. I think it should be safe. Remember — no money, no honey. If you get along, have a second date and talk about an arrangement then.

  39. The Real Dave says:

    @anonymous @tvc both of you should keep talking , becuase Ive brought in at least 5 Facebook friends here and after reason your comments they feel like scamming women now . I. sure they have a network of friends who would also love to see how you 2 think. all you’re doing is creating a generation of men who won’t feel bad for fvcking women over .

    • Anonymous says:

      Which anonymous are you referring to and where did tvc post?

    • Anonymous says:

      That’s something all feminists do. I don’t have a centimeter of guilt about taking a woman for a ride anymore. They’re all rabid savages without morals or conscience who don’t see anyone else in the world except for themselves.

    • A Nonnymouse says:

      As opposed to the women who see your posts and afterwards feel fully justified in being rinsers?

      Rinsers and male scammers need no reasons, they try it because it’s what they are.

      Mind you, I call bullshit on most of the claims that both rinsers and scammers and red pill/PUA artists make. They’re mostly hookers and johns rationalising their behaviours, or in the case of the PUA/red pill types, just plain lying. For most of them, the only way they’d get the sheets squirted on would be if they cut themselves while shaving the palm of the hand that loves them.

      • Anonymous says:

        I didn’t scam anyone until I was scammed over and over again on this site so you’re analysis is flawed. I was invited and took the invitation. That’s all

  40. rembodler says:

    I have never said (or done) monthly, so I am not sure where this came from.
    As for the cynical attitude…I think there is a difference between considering every stranger u meet, a thief and giving this stranger your wallet full of cash. I do not do either.

    • FatB'StardSA says:

      “I think there is a difference between considering every stranger u meet, a thief and giving this stranger your wallet full of cash.”

      Are you worried the stranger will loose your wallet or destroy it by accident? If not then assuming the stranger is a thief would be the only reason you would not want to give them your wallet full of cash.

      • Jaybird923 says:

        Congratulations! You’ve out done yourself. Officially the dumbest thing you’ve ever posted. Lol

      • FatB'StardSA says:

        @Jaybird

        Here is my statement presented for those of limited reasoning ability…I assumed you would benefit as well.

        You have a valuable item. You do not want to give it to a person because they will:

        1. steal it
        2. loose it
        3. break it

        Please correct my reasoning oh wise one…

        Have a nice day :-)

      • Jaybird923 says:

        I do not give a stranger my wallet because
        1. He is a stranger.
        2. Because I am not stupid
        3. See 1 and 2

      • FatB'StardSA says:

        @Jaybird

        He is a stranger => I do not know if this person will steal it, loose it, or break it

        Your claim of not being stupid is suspect but I will give you the benefit of the doubt. Thus:

        I am not stupid => I will not give a valuable item to a stranger because I do not know if this person will steal it, loose it, or break it

        You can thank me now.

        Have a nice day :-).

    • rembodler says:

      In one case I broke into your car. In the other you left your car with a key on its windshield, with a note “please do not take the car key”. In the ideal world you should keep your car regardless. It is just that in the first case I am clearly a thief; in the second case you are clearly an idiot.

      • FatB'StardSA says:

        @Rem

        Unfortunately your analogy is flawed.

        Your refusal to give your wallet to a particular person does imply that you believe that person is a thief (or they possess one of the other character traits I described).

        Your refusal to leave your keys in the car implies that you believe that there is a thief in the area.

        Sorry but there is quite a large difference between the two.

        Have a nice day :-).

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        Poor FB. Let me help you.

        [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_diligence]

  41. Anonymous says:

    I know that @Elaine has claimed to leave several times…Did TVC claim to leave as well?

    • The Real Dave says:

      the women on this blog speak with a forked tongue. they say they willl leave but never do. they also call men rapists and creepers yet is they (Elaine and damn vapid) who tried to stalk me , find my profile , and reverse image search me.

      • Anonymous says:

        Then we have that one Anonymous that’s always storming off but always comes back. She just like the drama.

      • Anonymous says:

        The male trolls talk about female fashion, incite drama, post whiney rants constantly, profess their love and preference of male company ect,. and storm off in fits of pms like rage. so calling them shes instead of he’s is a very accurate assertion, anon.

  42. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Jay

    So far no comments from YGBKM and the anonymouses. I will keep you posted. :-)

    As to your moms advise, I am sure you realize that same logic is beyond racial profiling.

    • Jaybird923 says:

      Not really. I’M translating from a different language and some of the words can’t directly be switched out for english ones. The advice has nothing to do with the person race,class, etc. It has to do with reputation. Once you’ve already established a reputation for something it’s hard to shake it afterwards. It was a cautionary tale of sorts.

      People will always suspect the theif of stealing even if he no longer steals. And the village whore will always be known as a whore even if she stops gets married and never sleeps with another man again.

      Rehabilitation is a nice ideal but few people truly accept that it’s possible.

      • Anonymous says:

        And that is why I stick to big cities.

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        Am not going to bother going back to copy and paste exactly what I said, but the gist is…FunDude is 98% moron, and 2% buns of steel.

        So much so that sometimes his idiot brain can not process how the rubbish that falls out of his mouth is disparaging toward entire groups of people, and offensive EVEN TO THOSE WHO FALL OUTSIDE THOSE GROUPS.

        What I said was that whatever he said over there didnt have to be racist to be unwelcome. He is so seasoned at being atrocious that it reeks from his pores.

        And the tactic he uses to rebut racial accusations is racial baiting with links to Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan, Malcolm X, white female feminists and Hillary Clinton?? ygbkm! Telling a black female blogger that she is supporting white feminist who want to shit on her? Because he has spontaneously appointed himself the voice of black advocacy? Or is it another opportunistic selling point to whine about women and his lack of experience with them? An attempt to use one group to undermine another. Simply a slimy tactic to stir shit, and rally for a cause he only spouts to support his own agenda. Feminists, after all, are the worst of marginalized evil. And they must be destroyed! Even before the blacks and the gays.

        Regarding false accusations… I support exonerating even the worst of vermin from such claims. Im glad that Jay was able to shed some light on the situation. Though it appears, with this recent tirade of his, that FunDude is showing colors truer to those initially suggested.

        Hope that satisfies your inquiry.

      • Anonymous says:

        She summed that up perfectly.

        I have seen others accused of much worse than Fundude, by Fundude, when those accusations were actually false. None of the motley crew came out to support those bloggers who, falsely accused, and actually contributed to the sugar community.

        You get what you give in life- karma if you will- and I am going to take a wild guess FunDude et al. do not have many friends out in the realz world.
        He brings it all on himself and the thought of anyone taking up for him is questionable.

      • Anonymous says:

        Pack of judgemental she wolves has now spoken

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        Am thinking that youre a couplefew she-wolves short of a pack. Could be wrong.

      • Anonymous says:

        {{{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=booKP974B0k}}}

        Happy leap year, @YGBKM!

      • FatB'StardSA says:

        @YGTOSTUPID

        I am glad that @Jaybird was able to confirm that @FunDude did not say anything racist otherwise you would have actually had to have read his posts to make your own decision.

        I can see how clever the blog SB’s can be. Is any mystery why they are not earning big dollars…unfortunately no…

        Have a nice day :-).

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        Thank you for your warm remarks, FB.

        How much I make?

        $100 thousand dollars…

        that’s in 2 days.

        I generally read the first line of FunDude’s posts, then I vomit and wipe my ass with the last line. Call it The Purge :(

        It’s always a pleasure reading from you.

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        @anonymous re: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=booKP974B0k]

        sexy! Thanks 😀

        Just cut a leg off of my tights! hehe

  43. The Real Dave says:

    @ anonymous who said its not a big deal to get messages on this site . well if I get 10 messages per day then I have more options ,the price of vagina decreases . if I had to pursue the women on this site then I’d have to pay more for vagina . I get women, at least 2 to 3 substantials per day , who after waiting long enough and not getting what they want from this site , are willing to spend at least 4 hours with me in exchange for Christian Dior
    products , dinner , and a Bebe body con skirt
    . haha .

    • Fundude says:

      When I get a bunch of messages from “long distance SBs”, there must be a demand problem among the SD side.

      Ergo, the bargaining power is clearly with the SD in most cases

    • Anonymous says:

      Dear make believe diary on SA. Wishful thinking entries #2,583 and 2,584

      • The Real Dave says:

        how would I know anything about Bebe body con skirts if my post was make believe ?

      • Anonymous says:

        Kaitlin Jenner has made me more understanding of crossdressers so no judgements.

      • FatB'StardSA says:

        Glad to know you follow Kaitlin Jenner…@Damn Vixen would be the SB for you.

        Have a nice day :-).

      • The Real Dave says:

        dear anonymous…so you need to rely on a transgender man to teach you about women’s fashions ? the patriarchy strikes again .

  44. The Real Dave says:

    my SB said this at dinner last night :”I thought I was going to get rich from this site ” – hahahahahhaha – after which I proceeded to give her $200 for the weekend . haha

  45. FatB'StardSA says:

    @SD’s

    @Rem made a comment about how SD’s should not take a cynical view of SB’s. This is REALLY bad advise.

    A typical SD has a fixed budget (say practical). Every monthly allowance a SB rinser gets out of a SD needs to be amortized over the other arrangement payments. All it takes is a few SB rinsers to decrease the value proposition of a SD’s arrangements significantly.

    How high are the risks? How many blog SB’s have stated that a SD loosing a monthly allowance is not that big a deal or that a “real” SD should not care about loosing a monthly allowance. None of the blog SB’s consider themselves rinsers.

    Unless you are fortunate enough (or desire) to have very long term arrangements you better be very careful who you give your allowance to.

    Have a nice day :-)

  46. Brittney says:

    This site is the best dating site. I think it’s really awesome how guys will pay to just go out with you but what I want to know is when are they supposed to give it to you? Are they supposed to give it to you before the dinner or after it?

    • Jaybird923 says:

      Have him pay before dinner. That way if you’re not a great dinner companion/conversationalist he can’t renege. You get your money and a stomach full of food. Win win

    • Frank95 says:

      I hate to break it to you Brittney, but most guys on this site won’t pay to “just go out with you”. That’s the “What’s Your Price” site.

      Here, it’s more like “the sugar starts to flow when the panties hit the floor”.

      Expect to be able to ask more from older guys, and from younger guys who are assholes. Expect less from younger guys who are average in personality, and don’t expect much $$ at all from younger guys with stellar personalities….they’ve got women lining up for ten city blocks giving it away free. :)

      • Jaybird923 says:

        Now now Frank why ruin girl’s fantasy? She would have discovered that soon enough on her own. She seemed so happy… I couldn’t bring myself to douse her hope.

      • Frank95 says:

        Oh, wicked, wicked Zoot, I mean Jay,”..Oh, she is a naughty person and she must pay the penalty, and here in Castle Anthrax, we have but one punishment for setting alight the grail-shaped beacon: you must tie her down on a bed and spank her…”

        Apologies to: Python, M. “Monty Python and the Holy Grail”, Cleese, Palin et al, 1975.

  47. X says:

    Heads up, sugar babies… BondOne40 / ebcee51a is fake. He says he works in entertainment finance, but he really just is a basic insurance guy.

  48. ATLSD says:

    For those that might be interested and a side note to all the vile here lately.
    Kenna was married earlier today in Barbados.

    Your welcome

  49. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Jay

    Well yes. You can also look at anonymous posters from 10.26 and 10.48 as well as YGBKM. They were know conclusively shown to be prejudicial spirits with lynch mob mentality. Let see what they do about it. Especially that person lecturing about social and emotional intelligence should show some courage and apologize.

    • Anonymous says:

      Fundude has no emotional or social intelligence.
      He is an annoying troll.

      How is that for you?

      Cheers :-)

      • Anonymous says:

        At least he is honest, unlike some other trolls who promised to leave this blog yet keep coming back to troll here under “anonymous.” Such deceitful behavior is casting doubt on every single statement Elaine and TVC ever made.

      • Anonymous says:

        Is this anonymous seriously accusing another anonymous of trolling under anonymous?

      • Anonymous says:

        Unlike Elaine and TVC, this anonymous did not promise to leave the blog here. Elaine and TVC posting under “anonymous” after promising to leave the blog here is prima facie evidence of deceit.

      • Anonymous says:

        LOL that was funny. Unless you were being serious, which makes it even more hilarious.

      • Anonymous says:

        Feel free to take a mirror and laugh at your own failed life, TVC.

      • Anonymous says:

        I am not a TVC whatever that means but you are entertaining anonymous #35 or whomever you are.

        Hope you have a good evening and sort out your mental issues. :-)

      • Anonymous says:

        Keep projecting, TVC.

    • Jaybird923 says:

      well it’s his own fault he post so vile stuff that no one has a hard time believing the worst of him. My mom has a saying that roughly translate to “If you’re known for being a thief in the village no matter if you’re now reformed every time something goes missing you’re the first one the cops pick up.”

  50. Fundude says:

    Malcolm X talks about “White liberal Democrats” and their fraudulent sympathy for blacks:

    {{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Y1jdsopdpE}}

    Maybe you can learn something from Malcolm on the issue. You clearly need an education on where liberal feminists come from.

  51. Fundude says:

    Racist Hollywood White Liberals make sure there is no diversity at the Oscars.

    {{http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3468596/The-Reverend-Al-Sharpton-leads-OscarsSoWhite-protest-near-Dolby-Theater-88th-Academy-Awards-kick-off.html}}

    Wow, I thought those White feminist liberal types were all about “diversity”.

    I guess they like “diversity” only when the “diverse” know their role in the plantation (below the White feminist liberal).

    Know your place!

  52. Another Anonymous says:

    @ YGBKM

    Now, that Jay clarified that FunDude did NOT write anything racist on the moderated blog, would you care to comment on your previous posts today, say the one from 9.50 am, that expertise speaks for itself and only bullies ask for a proof?

    • Jaybird923 says:

      Translation: Nan nanny boo boo :-p

    • Anonymous says:

      Poor whittle fundude who never uses derogatory names to push his bullshiet, hot button topics and offensive diatribe on others like faggot ect. being falsely accused of racism! Gasp! Poor innocent thing.

    • Fundude says:

      White feminist liberal women don’t care about truth.

      Its all about power for them. They will use the “racism” stuff to silence White males who oppose their feminist privilege.

      They use minorities to push their agenda but really don’t give a shit about them.

  53. Fundude says:

    Louis Farrakhan realizes that Hillary Clinton is a racist feminist White “privileged” bitch. At least he is smart enough to see through the bullshit SJW White female feminists.

    I don’t agree with Louis on most issues but he damn well right on this one!

    {{http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/02/28/farrakhan-dont-fall-for-satan-hillary-clintons-crap/}}

    Maybe Jaybird can learn something about feminist SJWs like Hillary Clinton.

    • Jaybird923 says:

      Feminist SJW are your fetish not mines

      • Frank95 says:

        Entitled “Princes” with GBS (Golden Boxer Syndrome), always seem to think others care about their opinions. Let’s see if the voters out there care less. Or not. 😀

      • Fundude says:

        Jaybird,

        Your dumbass always supports them agains the “evil patriarchy White men” such as myself.

        Remember, you’re useful as long as you know your place in the SJW totem pole. Thats below the White feminist woman.

        Feminism was made to privilege White middle class/upper middle class/upper class women.

        Blacks are only allowed onto the plantation as long as they know their role, which is to vote liberal so that White feminists can have nice govt positions and give the blacks the crumbs off the table.

      • Jaybird923 says:

        1)How do I always support “them” against you? I stand up for you when I have a reason to do so. You just so rarely give me a reason to. I disagree with almost all the nonsense you post here and it just so happen that some of “them” do too. I don’t automatically support any person or group. Only stupid people do things like that.

        2)Are you now regretting the fact that I spoke up about you not posting racist stuff and have decided that you liked that form of attention too. So you’ve started to posting racially charged comments to make up for the lose?

      • Fundude says:

        @Jaybird

        I guess Malcolm X, Louis Farrakhan and Al Sharpton are all “racist” against blacks too?

        Notice who I linked to the above posts.

        Are you denying that White liberal feminists act this way?

      • Jaybird923 says:

        I have no idea what’s in any of those post. I told you a long time ago I refuse to watch anything you post anymore. Plus I’m not going to let you drag me into this little temper tantrum you’re throwing.

        Go do something productive with your anger and lift some weights or maybe a punching bag. Then get your self I nice, cold juice box and some animal crackers and watch some TV.

      • Frank95 says:

        Funnily enough, if you look at the last Presidential election, it was the demographic of African-american women and latinas that delivered the edge. Most other demographics were not dramatically skewed one way or t’other.

        So, someone wanting to gain the white house needs to convince African-american women and latinas to switch sides. That’s the fact of the matter.

        White guys and women are basically “rusted on” they’re all going to vote for the same party for the whole of their lives. The only difference being whether they come out to vote.

        African-american women and Latinas on the other hand, win them, and you win the Presidency. Which is why senior Republicans are in despair over Trump. He’s basically fucked up any hope of African-american women or Latinas voting for him, so, Republicans will spend hundreds of millions on the election, but have no chance of winning because they’ve pissed off the most important demographics.

        I reckon Trump is a closet Democrat. He’s certainly Hillary’s greatest asset.

  54. rembodler says:

    A retroactive arrangement structure.

    While I am firm believer in the “no honey, no money” rule, I think there is something I have not done before, but would try, if offered.
    I believe that SBs may exist who genuinely want to establish trust and chemistry before “anything happens”. Why doesn’t such SB offer a retroactive deal to her POT? The deal would be like this: “Say, we agree to X platonic dates before we are intimate. If we do not end up in the arrangement, you owe me nothing. If we end up in the arrangement, instead of Y per date, I will get Y+Z”. In other words, the first dates are only covered once the arrangement is consummated.
    I wonder if anybody did anything of that sort?

    • Jaybird923 says:

      Interesting…Let me see if I understand what you’re getting at.

      1) I want time to get to know you before getting intimate.
      2) So we agree to go on let’s say five dates before any intimacy happens. 3) After the five dates we decide we want to move forward so instead of the $500 a date you would normally give I would get $500+ $100 extra? (this is the part I was confused about)

      If my interpretation of your post is correct what is in it for the SD? Why would he agree to that?

      • Jaybird923 says:

        Now if you were saying instead of the $500 you would normally give for the first 5 dates after the trial period I would get $400 instead and then go back to the regular “fee” then I can see some advantage for both of them.She gets the time she needs and he gets a temporary price break.

    • Anonymous says:

      Doesn’t that just make it all about sex and intimacy again? Same thing as going forward with it, the pussy and dick are always in the equation.

    • Nameless says:

      rem I’ve tried that I offered a small amount for the platonic then when the deal is sealed I would pay the full amount for all the dates we had no one would take that offer they all want to be paid upfront

      • rembodler says:

        @Nameless – that just shows that most of this “let me get to know you” is smoke and mirrors…

    • rembodler says:

      No, I thought the first.
      Say, we agree to five no sex dates. They will be technically at $250 – but if we split after five dates, you get nothing. If we get in the arrangement, the first five dates will be at $650 and then go back to $400.
      This way you only get the money if you follow thru. You are not trying to rinse me and dump – you only get dinners and conversation if you are not serious or changed your mind.
      Obviously, the guy has to agree to that. Provided that most arrangements start on the second date – it is still a very tough order and the guy must really want you. But I think it is easier then asking to be paid $250 for doing five dinners?

      • Jaybird923 says:

        But what is the incentive for you? You essentially wasted money and time. If she doesn’t follow through you wasted money and time going on platonic dates. If she does follow through you’re spending more money than you would have too if you’d just stuck to the no pay for the get to know me stage.

      • Jaybird923 says:

        The only way that’s advantageous for the SD is if he is the one who wanted time to get to know the SB…

      • rembodler says:

        There is nothing better than “no paying for getting to know”…;-)).
        But just in case… he is soooooo fascinated with you.

      • SugarD says:

        No way @Rem ! Platonic is only for the SB’s benefit. The date is enough plus, she needs full on incentive to tap the ATM

  55. The Real Dave says:

    if having an arrangement was so great , Brandon Wade wouldn’t be married . he doesn’t believe in his own product . what i see happening is one side, the beta bucks , get emotionally attached to their SBs because that’s the hottest piece of azz he’s ever gotten .

  56. Another Anonymous says:

    @Jay

    Thank you. It is nice to hear from somebody who deals in facts. :-)

  57. Jaybird923 says:

    For the record Fundude didn’t say anything racist on that blog. He paid the moderator a compliment on the logic of her post and one of the other bloggers decided to tell him she was black and quote a comment from his stupid red pill blog out of context.

    Fundude is a loud mouth that says a lot of stupid shit but he’s not guilty of what he’s being accused of this time.

    • yougottabekiddingme says:

      Fair enough. Thanks for sharing, Jay.

    • Fundude says:

      Actually that wasn’t the moderate that “banned” me. The black dude didn’t really have any comments on it.

      It was some White feminist SJW that purposely distorted my arguments who was then “appointed” as a moderator retroactively by another White feminist.

      She decided to ban me over comments from my red pill reddit due to “racism”.

      The black male moderator is actually quite red pill if you look through his posts. He is just too scared to open his mouth to the White feminist mafia.

      • Fundude says:

        moderator

      • Jaybird923 says:

        I didn’t say one word about you being banned because I don’t care and I don’t know the facts surrounding that. All I knew for a fact is that you weren’t guilty of racist post on that blog.

    • Fundude says:

      Remember, White feminist SJW only care about “racism” in so much as they can benefit from it in terms of job preference and keeping their privilege. They really couldn’t give two shits about blacks/hispanics/etc outside of allowing it to keep their privilege.

  58. Fundude says:

    Everything is racist, everything is sexist, everything is homophobic and we have to point it all out!

    {{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL2Zmye3BkY}}

    Anita= ideological founder of current ideas from our sugar bloggers

  59. Kore says:

    Like some people on the blog whining and sniveling about pussssssyyy? 😀

    • Anonymous says:

      Their lack of pussy more like. Even the girls they pay to touch are not sticking around much or they would not be here ALL weekend long. If you have a girl around you are not posting on no blog aka the @FunDude show.

    • Frank95 says:

      Guys who are getting it regularly tend to be at peace with the world.

      Guys who are not getting it regularly tend to be bitter misogynists complaining ’bout “da feminists”.

  60. Fundude says:

    Everything is racist, everything is sexist, everything is homophobic and we have to point it all out!

    {{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL2Zmye3BkY}}

  61. Fundude says:

    I see nothing productive has come out of the worthless sugar “baby” bloggers who post here. Just more bitching about myself lol Despite not being here since this morning, its the same bitching about myself all day lol

    The reddit blog doesn’t offer much better. I just checked it out. Some clown just posted something about talking about “cocaine fueled parties” are more interesting than discussing “money in terms of allowances” due to it being “boring”.

    So I guess clowns talking to each other about fanciful unverifiable stories is the modus operandi of that reddit. No productive discussions about allowances/arrangements/valuations/etc.

  62. Fundude says:

    Thunderfoot destroys Black Lives Matters and feminist communications “professor”.

    This guy thunder foot is a PHD chemist who does ground breaking research with very rational arguments.

    {{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWnOes3wQiM}}

    • Kore says:

      Still at posting these weird videos FD? You should turn into a reporter or something, lol.

      • Fundude says:

        “Weird” as in a video posted by a youtube personality with >450K subscribers with 100s of thousands of views.

        Yes very “weird”

      • Kore says:

        You’ve linked conspiracy theories, SJW-extremisits, and videos of just plain stupid people.. In the normal world, not every other person is intentionally contributing to a dystopia.

        It’s kinda negative.

      • Anonymous says:

        Kore’s back. Forgot all about that nut

  63. yougottabekiddingme says:

    Says the incestuous pheasant who spends every spare moment of his pathetic life trolling the Brown Sugar page.

  64. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Anonymous

    I am talking about him providing references for outside sources. Not about local habit of splitting hair.

  65. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Anonymous

    Absolutely serious. We can disagree with his sources of information, but he provides the links.

    • Anonymous says:

      You must be reading another blog as the rest of us.
      How often has @Fundude been asked to provide prove of his “quotes”? Maybe you should ask @Jaybird, I have seen her asking him for prove numerous times, as did @Elaine.
      His answers? Crickets!

      • Anonymous says:

        Fundud is link crazy. He almost always puts up a link to support whatever he’s saying. Saying any different isn’t going to change that reality

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        FunDude has never, in the history of his false accusations against people here, provided a link to support his claims. Posting a link to some radical alpha-dogs-only page is not providing proof of WHAT SOMEONE SAID HERE.

        Most recently, he claimed that female bloggers were supporting rinsing. He never did respond to requests for proof.

        My remarks regarding his comments on the other blog were that it’s not a matter of political correctness, but the climate they want in the blog space there.

        FunDude HAS made reductive comments about particular groups. Just because you don’t find them racist doesn’t mean they want such comments there.

      • Jaybird923 says:

        Fundude never provides proof he just pretends not to see the comment or try to change the subject. He only provides “proof” for his feminist nonsense

      • Anonymous says:

        All I have to say is; read the other blog.
        Check what @Jay, @TVC, @Elaine and @Fundude really have posted there and please come back to report.

      • Fundude says:

        Everything I write is grounded in factual links and arguments unlike you angry feminists

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        @Anonymous

        Is something wrong with your eyes or cursor? Click your ass over there, and read it yourself.

  66. FedUpAnon says:

    I have spent the day chatting to 30 potential SB’s, everyone has turned out to be platonic. I now avoid any profile with the hint of friendship, getting to know one another like the plague. My renew icon has just popped up, only an idiot would sign up again. SA is dead.

    • Anonymous says:

      That’s true. I was smart enough to get out of here a year ago but my stupid ass came back. It’s a waste. There are no girls here at all unless you want pay for play situations.

    • Anonymous says:

      I have to agree. The site has become infested with a plague of platonics. This one popped up around where I live today with a moderate allowance.

      “I only will do companionship. Nothing yucky, I’m very conservative. I’m pretty and I’m fun and I’m real. That should be all a guy needs.”

      It really cracked me up. Then I began to think maybe it was written by a dude just playing with us. Or even more sinister, SA is being spammed by its competitors with these types of profiles in a effort to drive the SDs off the site. If this person is for real, incredibly delusional and clueless. I felt like commenting via a message to the profile, but thought that might not be the best in etiquette.

  67. Another Anonymous says:

    Was it moderated out or is it still visible? If visible I would appreciate a link.

    And FD actually usually provides reasonable links if he quotes somebody.

    • Anonymous says:

      “And FD actually usually provides reasonable links if he quotes somebody.”

      You cannot be serious ….

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        FunDude does no such thing.

        Also, how is anonymous supposed to provide a link for a comment that’s been moderated?

  68. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Dave

    It is fun here, you are right. I was already diagnosed as having no social and emotional intelligence just for asking to see a comment that got somebody moderated out from the forum. It is a new version of 1984. We should disagree with a post without being allowed to see it. The same mind set as Spanish inquisition or communist propaganda.

  69. Another Anonymous says:

    @ YGBKM

    Actually no. If he is accused of writing racist comments on another forum, we should be allowed to see the evidence. If you do not agree to this, fine, but then the conversation degenerates into a high school hate fest.

    There was no compromising statement, just an anonymous third party comment without any validity.

    • Anonymous says:

      Go and check yourself?
      It’s a public blog and nobody keeps you from visiting and check for yourself.

      Funny you ask for evidence though …
      Have you ever asked @Fundude for evidence of all his idiotic statements?

      • Anonymous says:

        Oh, and one more thing….
        Since Fundude and Dave are posting here this blog IS already degenerated in a high school hate fest.
        A female hate fest, so to say.

  70. The Real Dave says:

    all this fvcking drama here ! this is awesome ! almost as fun as scamming hoes

  71. Arrangment Meltdown! says:

    Here’s how my ‘exclusive’ arrangement ended…

    My SB never took her ad down and would be on and off the SA, sometimes constantly and sometimes leave it for months. My snooping kind of drove me crazy (my fault). I would ask her about it now and then, ask if she wanted to be non-monogamous, she would always say no, usually saying something like that all her friends kept their dating ads up, or what am I doing on there? About our 11th month, we discussed it again. And she took it down. I thought perhaps we had entered a period of more trust.

    WRONG! About a month later her behavior seemed a bit odd, my suspicion peaked I went out to see if her ad was up, it wasn’t, but a brand new ad was out there, different name and text, the tone of her ad was very sexually explicit. She even referred to our arrangement and some of the things she enjoyed about it in the past tense! I then created a phony ID, asked to see her private photos and guess what she was posing in the bras and clothes I had bought her. I actually took the next step and she agreed to an arrangement with the phony me, negotiated an allowance and agreed to sleep over the first night if the date went well! All the time she had a date planned with the ‘real’ me. So she was ready to sleep with the new stranger SD on Friday night and me on Sunday.

    Now that said, I wasn’t being monogamous in our arrangement either, so I was trying to play both sides also.

    After a lot of acrimony and confrontation we split up…a year long arrangement that was pretty good all came crashing down. It was my first arrangement, had a lot of fun, and learned a lot about myself.

    I will not snoop again, it caused a lot of anguish and hurt me, I will not bother asking about or expecting monogamy…it only lead me down a path of suspicion and snooping. And it led her to being more deceitful. I will evaluate my arrangement based simply on how my SB treats me and takes care of me…

    Finally I will never date another psychologist! I think she was using her professional training to successfully manipulate me ! lolol!

  72. Another Anonymous says:

    @ YGBKM

    And actually that anonymous comment was one of the ugly tricks in debate. To accuse somebody of racism and not quoting the evidence is a typical move of cowards and manipulators.

    • yougottabekiddingme says:

      There comes a point ones inflammatory comment career when their expertise speaks for itself.

      On the contrary, “Show me proof” is a tactic used by proxies, bullies and manipulators to undermine the validity of a compromising statement.

      • Anonymous says:

        Who is Another Anonymous. Josh? And who needs proof when FunDude writes way worse stuff here all the time.
        All you need to do is read a couple of his complete insane posts and there you have it.

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        Re:” FunDude writes way worse stuff here all the time. All you need to do is read a couple of his complete insane posts and there you have it.”

        That’s what I said :)

        …There comes a point [in] ones inflammatory comment career when their expertise speaks for itself.

      • Anonymous says:

        Yes. Right.
        Boggles the mind why any person with any social or emotional intelligence would ask for proof of him being completely out of line after they read even one of FunDude’s posts.

      • Anonymous says:

        Because Fundud’s not usually racist. He’s a lot of shit but haven’t seen him touch racism

  73. Another Anonymous says:

    @ YGMKM

    Quite to the contrary. I suspect it was an absolutely appropriate and truthfullness comment and a politically correct moderator is out of control.

    • yougottabekiddingme says:

      Thanks for your reply, AA.

      I visited the page once earlier this week. I didn’t really hang out long, but what I gather is that the tone and disagreements are much more civil there.

      It’s not so much about political correctness as it is wanting to have a constructive and informative place to share. That is the culture they’ve established there, and apparently, people who don’t like it can post their vitriol here.

      SA couldn’t care less about the state of this blog. Some may enjoy the attention-seeking and drama-filled alternative, but it doesn’t seem to be a place where most feel inclined to participate…as evidenced by the sound of crickets where there used to be valued insight.

      It’s not where you play, but how you play. People here play as if they’ve been deprived of toys and adventure their entire lives, and have only found sticks and stones to entertain themselves.

      Quite a bore.

  74. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Anonymous

    Can you share with us, what was the racist comment, that got moderated out?

    • yougottabekiddingme says:

      Why are you requesting that?

      Hungry for racism? Visit the Brown and Beautiful blog topic, and indulge in an all-you-can-eat buffet.

  75. Fundude says:

    Ok got to do stuff.

    Will be away until later tonight.

    Lets see all the “profound” insights that go on here without myself being present.

    • Anonymous says:

      It’ll just be the usual hags trying to type while they’re choking on dicks. Nothing too profound about that since they have a lot of practice doing it

  76. Fundude says:

    Why does Elaine and TVC insist on posting here as “anonymous” constantly?

    We all know its them lol

    • Anonymous says:

      Obsessed much? You continue to “see” them everywhere, don’t you?

      It doesn’t come up in your underdeveloped brain that other bloggers are very annoyed by your posts, does it?
      That some people actually liked the contributions of the bloggers you chased away?

  77. Jaybird923 says:

    How many of you have ever re-entered into an arrangement with a prior SB/SD? If you have, what was different from the first time around that made you give it another shot? And were things better or did the same issues that led to the end of the first arrangement reappear?

    I’m strong believer of never traveling the same road twice.It’s almost a guarantee that the experience will be the same. People are fundamentally who they are, no matter how much they profess to have changed they can only suppress their true nature for so long.

    • yougottabekiddingme says:

      Good question, Jay. Am interested to read peoples’ experiences. Maybe there will actually be some constructive insight since FunDude will be busy taking the 1000-squat challenge.

    • Nameless says:

      I’m not sure I can answer that I met a lady I’ll say that loosely she was not one I met her on another site it didn’t work out then she found me on this site she talk nice and sweet said she had changed and saw my viewpoint and would like to try again well she lives far away from me so we set up a time to meet so while I’m waiting we talk by email daily it didn’t take long for her old habits to appear to you can’t hide who you are for long I canceled our meeting and wished her well

    • rembodler says:

      I did this a couple of times. Your post implies that for the arrangement to dissolve something must have gone wrong. Not necessarily. People get busy with their lives, get boyfriends, relocate and come back and so on. Do not get me wrong, I love making new notches in the bedpost, but getting back with your old flame has the same cosy feeling as getting into your old plush bathrobe.
      For everything else is MasterCard (C).

      • Jaybird923 says:

        Actually my post implies nothing. I’m aware of cases like yours but my interest was in the particular situation I posted about. That’s why I made the question very specific.

        I agree with you that in a situation like yours it makes perfect sense to go back. You can skip the awkward getting to know you/what are you into stage.

  78. Fundude says:

    Personal Quotes from “MidWestMMA dude” (aka weak faggot) to myself on reddit that started our little spat.

    Remember, I had never spoken with that omega before he personally messaged me there ideas:

    First statement of introduction to myself: “Go fuck a real doll you beta ass bitch. You are a shrimpy dude who wears shoe lifts.”

    When asked by myself who he was, he continued with:

    “I’m your worst nightmare. You keep date raping women in Chicago
    Your cant keep a girl interested even if you are paying them”

    “I’ll crush you like a beta. Your fat girlfriend couldn’t touch my dick if she paid me.
    I’m 46 and I could destroy you at the gym, in mma, or anything else. I have more millions than you will ever make in a lifetime. Bring it”

    Then I told the faggot to get lost and stop wasting my time with his omega ass.

    The faggot then continued to email me:

    “I’ll destroy your beta ass.
    You whine like a stuck pig about women all day long.
    I’ll hog tie your girl and fuck her till she bleeds.”

    “I can get any chick I want. They are paid to go away. I’m busy making money. Not pushing paper in a rat lab like you.
    Your girl couldn’t take my dick.” This was in reference to myself making fun of him paying 10K to get ass lol

    Then MidWestSD faggot started his “real life” fight nonsense including:

    “I’ll fight you in Chicago at the mma gym of your choice. Any weekend will do. 5 minutes. Full gear.
    Name the time and place.”

    “That’s what I thought.
    I’ll fly up there in Michigan in March. Name the weekend.
    Unless you are afraid of a 210 lb sugar daddy who will destroy you.”

    Ever since this comment, I have been trying to set it up with specifics. Of course the omega has now gone ghost.

    Im 6 foot and 210lb myself.

    Ergo, this would be a good sparring session. Where did you go sweetie?

    • Fundude says:

      I have given him a specific place, time, etc to show up next week.

      He has gone ghost. What happened killer?

      Fucking reddit faggots lol

      • Anonymous says:

        right 😉

      • Fundude says:

        @TVC

        Go back to reddit so the posters can keep shitting on your over there

        I quite enjoy it when you post there ol

      • Anonymous says:

        Oh really?
        Haven’t seen anything on Reddit blog of what you are stating here. Not about TVC, not about Elaine. As a matter of fact, wasn’t it you who got blocked because you offended a black moderator with your racism insults?
        You’re a sad person “doctor” Fundude. Trolling numerous blogs with your ignorant nonsense and insults. You must have a very miserable life and very few “patients”, taking in consideration all time you spend trolling.

        You’re a joke “Doctor” Fundude, a sad clown and pitiable attention seeker.
        Grow up and get a life!

      • Anonymous says:

        You must have a thing for a TVC bc you imagine this everywhere.

      • Fundude says:

        @TVC

        Elaine and TVC got down voted big time on all of their posts.

        The tried their typical manipulation tactics whereby the told the younger SBs to avoid older SDs.

        Didn’t work out well lol

      • Anonymous says:

        “Oh really?
        Haven’t seen anything on Reddit blog of what you are stating here. Not about TVC, not about Elaine. As a matter of fact, wasn’t it you who got blocked because you offended a black moderator with your racism insults?”

        You even spend time on downvoting all their posts, didn’t you?
        Sad excuse of a “man” ….

      • Anonymous says:

        So focussed on TVC and Elaine, he followed them as a cud to the other blog and he can’t stop talking about them. Would be interesting to count how often he has mentioned them last week!
        Obsessed by mature women much?

      • Anonymous says:

        You two old hags are obsessed with FunDude. Penis envy much?

      • Anonymous says:

        No they envy his wealth and hate his confidence. They’re used to feminised white knights

      • Anonymous says:

        Wealth? Lol I haven’t seen any of FD’s wealth, and if I did how would I know it’s his. Anyone can claim to be anyone here. Idiots

      • Promise says:

        “I’m your worst nightmare.”
        No wonder he likes you so much. You’re both say the most cringe worthy things!

      • Anonymous says:

        I am not @TVC weirdos

    • Fundude says:

      P.S.

      Im sure I can out squat, deadlift and bench this faggot too lol

    • Jaybird923 says:

      @Fundude Why can’t you use the internet to search for porn to jack off to instead of wasting people’s time with your nonsense? He hangs out on reddit if you really wanted to set up a meet you would post there instead.

      And I noticed that you quoted his messages but only paraphrased yours pretty sure the conversation didn’t really go down like that. Get a life Dude this is beyond sad and pathetic

      • Fundude says:

        I’ve messaged him many times on reddit since this.

        He has gone ghost lol

        Betas gonna beta.

      • Jaybird923 says:

        Then shut the fuck up about it or go post this shit over there. It doesn’t make you look macho or manly. It just makes you look like what you are a sad pathetic person who will do anything for attention.

      • Fundude says:

        @Jay

        First off, I couldn’t give a rats ass what you think about the situation. Your opinion is meaningless.

        Second, my purpose is to shame this beta. It has nothing to do with you.

        Now go bitch somewhere else lol

      • Jaybird923 says:

        how exactly is it shamming him posting in a place he doesn’t hang out? The only one you’re bringing shame upon is yourself. You’re just too stupid to realize it. It’s like watching the sloppy drink at the party….

      • Anonymous says:

        This pathetic “man” is sick.
        He needs help.

  79. Fundude says:

    Milo destroying Feminists at Bucknell University!

    Love this guy!

    {[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnYwstdOfO4}}

  80. Promise says:

    FunDude, your Braham probably made him cringe so hard he wound up getting frozen in front of his computer screen.

  81. Another Anonymous says:

    @ FatB

    Very true, sir. One day I will take you on that offer to profile you. It should be fun.

    Have a nice evening.

  82. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Jay

    Well we obviously disagree or I did not explain myself well. What I meant was that modern divorce laws allowed to break the vows AND claim a right to property or parenting instead of the guilty party being fired without any further possible claims.

  83. FatB'StardSA says:

    @SD’s

    Supply and demand gives you an advantage on SA. This will probably be the only time in your dating life that this will be the case, don’t be an idiot and throw that advantage away.

    A SD may hope find that unicorn SB but be realistic about the woman you are dealing with on the site. Always keep looking for a replacement SB and always have a replacement SB in hand WHEN your current SB needs to be cut loose. If you are worried your SB will leave you then you are not using the site properly.

    Have a nice day :-).

    • rembodler says:

      I think this is maybe too cynical of a view. I do not believe every woman who signed up on SA is necessarily @TVC – a paranoid psychopath devoid of all human emotions, unless you consider men hating and the love of money as such. You can find some pretty normal women on here. Yes, they are not above using you now and then, but overall they retain features we normally associate with the other gender, including warmth and compassion.
      Just IMHO.

      • FatB'StardSA says:

        @Rem

        I would never claim every SB on SA is a @TVC15 clone, that would be extreme, but I think the “normal women” are few and far between. The “normal women” will take a lot more time to find and a lot more effort to get. Let’s be realistic, paying a $50/month fee does not open the portal to some magical universe where hot young normal women are lining to jump on a dick that has only seen a action from a right hand for the last few years.

      • Catcher 22 says:

        Please! Enough with your hateful, vicious verbal attacks on @TVC and other posters you disagree with. Do you not possess sufficient intelligence to express your opinions without resorting to sliming others?

      • Anonymous says:

        That is kind of their point and source of their sad lives. Personal attacks are their and his bread and butter so to speak. Only someone completely miserable and powerless in his real life would resort to this much trolling. The blog is not moderated at all so it is troll paradise.

      • Fundude says:

        Rem,

        You’d be surprised. Many college women think this way after taking women’s studies course or “psychology”

      • Anonymous says:

        @Catcher and Anon
        If you two ladies don’t like it here, why don’t you go to Reddit and post your cam adds there? Why come here and bitsch? No one is interested in your idiotic opinion.

    • Fundude says:

      Very good post and accurate.

      SDs have the large advantage in negotiation. Use it.

      Any student of business from a good MBA should have taken good negotiation tactics courses.

      This should be used extensively in dealings with SBs.

  84. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Curious

    The last, but a bit ugly advice. You know her, you know what she looks for, set up a new account, use few fake pics, pretent to be her ideal SD and contact her. And brace yourself for the answer.

    I would rather just assume nonexclusivity, but you can play these games, if you want to.

  85. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Jay

    Ad marriage vows – actually modern divorce laws made it possible to break them WITHOUT consequences. That is the difference.

    Ad Curious and logic – of course she is not doing anything wrong. But the conversation does not change much. She agrees to be exclusive, tomorrow she is back on SA and claims to do it for fun. Then what? See this whole issue of exclusivity is impossible to enforce.

    • Jaybird923 says:

      Ad marriage vows- I disagree. without social consequences… yeah. But there are still consequences. Lost of assets, parental rights,etc.

      Ad Curious and logic- Deactivate your profile first have conversation second. Tell her you’ve already deactivated yours and you expect her to do the same If she agrees to exclusive.

      She’ll log on and see that what you say is true and she’ll either follow suit or she’ll think well he’s not active free pass he won’t know. She could always create a new profile but since she hasn’t already chances are she won’t.

      • Fundude says:

        He meant consequences for women.

        In fact, women get mostly benefits after divorce such as alimony/assets from the man.

  86. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Jay

    As to teaching a lesson, well there is a bit of projection going on here. If she is doing any of those “innocent” activities, she will not mind Curious being active. If she immediately confronts him, well he got his answer.

    • Jaybird923 says:

      And you guys say women suffer from lack of logic (I know I say it too) SHE’S TECHNICALLY NOT DOING ANYTHING WRONG. THEY DIDN’T AGREE TO BE EXCLUSIVE. ROTFLMAO a simple “what do you think about us being exclusive?” and voila! mystery solved

  87. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Jay

    And you are completely right about the marital vows. The modern divorce laws made complete mockery out of them.

    • Jaybird923 says:

      Even before modern divorce laws people were making a mockery of marriage vows. the only thing that modern divorce laws did was make it easier to dissolve a marriage. Ever hear of an heir and a spare?

  88. Anonymous says:

    You’re an idiot if you pay extra for monogamous with any girl still in her 20s. They can’t do it. If you disagree with this, you’re out of the loop on current social dynamics

  89. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Jay and Curious

    Actually I think it is a good decision and not teaching a lesson. Just reminding that in sugar bowl everybody is an unrestricted free agent. And maybe Curious will find a SB he likes more. Nothing wrong with that.

    • Jaybird923 says:

      I disagree it is about teaching her a lesson. I find it childish and immature especially when this can be resolved one way or another with a simple conversation.

      What if she isn’t searching for a new SD and him logging on has the opposite effect than what he intended?

      • Anonymous says:

        Why else would she be back on the site unless she’s searching? There’s no other reason for her to come back

      • Jaybird923 says:

        Maybe she logs on to see other profiles? She might be participating on a blog/social media site where people ask for profile advice and she logs on to see.

        Or maybe she logs on with a friend for fun so she can read all the hilarious SD profiles on here.

        Maybe SA is keeping her profile active even when she doesn’t log in.

        Maybe her account has been hacked

        Maybe she’s looking for another SD since they did not agree to be exclusive!

      • Jaybird923 says:

        Or maybe she’s worried about the arrangement and is logging on to make sure he isn’t looking…

  90. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Jay

    The problem is that people here must be good at deception by definition. I can be seen with anybody, but if I am seen, my SB is fully expected to support some story and keep to herself, that we are in the sugar bowl.

  91. Curious in Seattle says:

    Thank you everybody for weighing in on my situation.
    I think I am going to start using my SA account again. And will not talk to T** about that. But this way she will know that I know. I will let her do the soul searching on what to do.
    Not sure it is the best course of action…but maybe she is taking me for granted and that will give her a pause.

    • Jaybird923 says:

      Does she continue to keep her part of the bargain?
      Did they way she treat you change in some way?
      Has there been any negative changes in her behavior?

      If no then why does she need to be taught a lesson for doing nothing wrong? You guys did not agree to be exclusive.If that is what you would like then discuss it with her and be an adult.

      The whole point of SA was to skip all the games and drama that you have to put up with in real life. You want something ask for it. Either she’ll agree or disagree and you can decide what to do from there.

    • rembodler says:

      Curious: Unless you already done so – wait! Watch her more carefully. Especially, does she reschedule dates with you? Is she guarding her phone more closely? That sort of thing. First tell her that you plan to do it, go on SA. Ask her if she has been visiting there. Do not tell her you knew all along. See what she says.
      To me the important thing would be if she is lying, not so much whether she is fukcing around.

      • Anonymous says:

        Stop all this shit. It’s not a relationship. Assume the whore will whore, suit up and live your life

      • Curious in Seattle says:

        @Rem. I don’t know whether I should like you or hate you. It is the phone. She used to leave it behind. But not anymore. When we went out a couple days ago, she took it with her when she went to wee.
        @Jay. I hate confrontation of any kind. And I cannot see that not ending in confrontation, mutual accusations and drama, exactly what it is supposed not to be.
        Thank you all once again, but I think I figured it out.

  92. Fundude says:

    I love the word brah these days.

    Dunno why, its just funny to say.

    Quite amusing actually.

    Milo vs angry feminists:
    {{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3_2svKFkE4}}

  93. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Jay

    Very true, thus it makes no sense to offer cash for such an ephemeral promise.

    • Jaybird923 says:

      People do it all the time. You give of yourself, your time, your resources to a husband or wife with no guarantee they’ll keep their vows. Some husbands never cheat on their wife and some are here on SA ;-).

      Everything in life is a gamble. When it comes down to it, the biggest deciding factor on whether you roll the dice or not is how important to you is what you stand to win.

      (some wives are here too I know)

  94. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Rem

    What dates back are you talking about? They were raped by deceit and fraud. SD should face criminal prosecution. :-)

  95. Fundude says:

    MMA faggot,

    I keep messaging your weak ass on reddit. Whats up brah?

    Was looking forward to beating your ass in real life brah.

    Lets make it more interesting. We can put some money on it.

    • Fundude says:

      or just send your girlfriend so we can show her a real man

      • Jaybird923 says:

        Give it up Fundude and stop wasting blog space with your nonsense no one believes you or cares except for the faux ingénue. Why don’t you just get her email address and spare the rest of us

      • Fundude says:

        @Jay

        He stated he is a “210 pound badass” on reddit to my personal “cool cat” name.

        Claiming he was going to “hog tie my girlfriend”, yada yada.

        Then he challenged me to an “MMA fight with full gear” for “5 mins”.

        Then after I have tried to set it up, the dude went ghost.

        Fucking reddit betas lol

  96. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Jay

    Personally I agree with Rem. Monogamy is a nice promise, but that is it. How will it be verified or enforced? And actually it can lead to funny conversations. Many SBs would agree that monogamy during their spare time sharply increases their value. How many would agree that having a BF or other SD sharply decreases their value?

    • rembodler says:

      Great point. If you start seeing another SD, will you offer your current one a discount? Since you are no longer exclusive to him and your “value” decreased?
      I think another fairly good question – how many SBs will agree to offer extra dates to an SD if he promises to be monogamous? You can argue that this decreases the risk to get an STD, especially if any unprotected games are involved. Great idea, right?
      My bet, none will do it. And yes, what if they discover that his lying ass is seeing three other chicks? How are they going to get these dates back?

    • Jaybird923 says:

      No matter what type of relationship it is monogamy is almost never guaranteed. All you can do is take someone at their word until you have proof or reason to believe that they are lying.

  97. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Jay

    None, of course. But there was a suggestion below that SD should pay extra for promised monogamy of their SB.

    • Jaybird923 says:

      @Another Everyone is different. Multiple partners have never held any appeal for me. So it makes no difference whether a SD asks for it or not it’s what he’ll get.

      But for some monogamy is an inconvenience/unpalatable so in order to agree to it they require an extra incentive. No different I guess to someone requiring more for kinks.

      Everything is up for negotiation in sugar. Either they’ll agree, disagree, or agree for a higher fee.

      • rembodler says:

        @Jay – you are (almost) right…;-). One can inquire whether she will be monogamous – “for free”. She can agree or disagree. Hard stop. No “agreeing for higher fee”.

      • Jaybird923 says:

        LOL Almost doesn’t count :-(.

        There has been several SBs who have said that they would be monogamous for a higher fee.And several Sds who have said they would be willing to pay more for exclusive. It’s just that you aren’t wiling to compensate for it. Which is totally fine

  98. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Local blogettes

    How many of you would agree to a cut in allowance, if your SD tells you he will stay monogamous?

  99. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Anonymous at 12.06

    Why being married makes a difference? A single SD can also send one text message and the arrangement is over.

  100. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Rem

    Good point. Surcharge for promised monogamy is a huge red flag. After all it is uncontrollable and unenforceable. But I see there an advantage for long distance/travel arrangements.

  101. anonymous says:

    have you heard about the one where this anonymous was talking to this anonymous?

  102. Anonymous says:

    Don’t trust any of these bitches. They all have to fuck multiple guys be it for free or for $. Get that in your head when you start this shit on here. These are just hoes. If you want more trustable women go to a regular dating site

    • Anonymous says:

      What bullshit is this? This isn’t a relationship or dating site, it’s an arrangement site with the NSA factor and arrangements can either be exclusive or not. People aren’t looking to get married here. Same thing can be said for these bastards, they will have 3 SBs at a time. So?

      • Anonymous says:

        So one minute you call use too broke to afford an SB, then the next minute we can afford 3. Pay attention to this everyone. This is the type of bitch/hoe that plays here

      • Anonymous says:

        Who called what, what are you on about? There are many SD’s with multiple SB’s and vice versa. Is this really news fucktard?

    • Fundude says:

      lol so true

  103. rembodler says:

    @Seattle
    U seem like a nice guy, not calling it duplicitous… I kinda think it is. She “knows” u r not looking and doing it behind your back. I find it disloyal. Just IMHO.
    Great to see the @TVC rinser is back, with her “you will have to pay for monogamous”…;)). Welcome back, TVC.
    Never ever ever “pay extra” for monogamous. Whoever tries to sell monogamous is a suspect and should be eliminated early in the screening process. Your current SB is s great example of why no one should be trusted.

    • Promise says:

      Were you on the reddit page too?

    • Anonymous says:

      How is she a rinser? It’s true, if you want her 24/7, not seeing anybody else, not fucking anybody else besides you, ignoring other guys etc. you’ll have to pay for an exclusive arrangement. After all, wasn’t this a point discussed before when talking about what makes an arrangement different from the other?

      • rembodler says:

        The only way it may – it may – work, if she is indeed with me 24/7. If she is with me, as it is normally is, one-two days a week I have no idea what she is doing when I am out of the picture.
        What I am gonna do – stalk her? Hire a private eye? And, let’s just say I do that, to find out she is “exclusively” seeing a few other gents – what am I going to do? Split with her? I can do it without wasting time (stalking) or money (PI). Obviously anyone trying to pitch monogamous as “it will cost you extra” is simply trying to extract more money for a very questionable benefit that it absolutely impossible to verify.

      • Anonymous says:

        Then why ask for monogamy at all?

  104. Promise says:

    I think a new blog is coming soon.

  105. Anonymous_SSSD says:

    Wow, Spring has sprung in my area of Northern CA…Lots of sb’s are logging on that I saw on here from 2+ years ago hoping for a Spring payday I guess. Lol!

  106. Curious in Seattle says:

    My current SB and I have been together for a few weeks. Recently I noticed that she updated her profile and is back on SA. Not every day, but still, frequently. I think she does not know that I know (Sheesh…reminds me of an episode on “Friends”). She never gave me any vibes that she is unhappy and wants to jump the ship or double-dip. I don’t think I did that either. If anything, she is one and only, I am happy with her and have no plans to move on. We never agreed or talked about being exclusive, so she is formally not doing anything duplicitous. And it is NSA, so I understand, maybe not necessarily the need, but the penchant for having plan “B”.
    Have you ever been in this situation? Should I ask her about it? Or keep pretending that I do not know and hope she fishes nothing out? Or – start myself looking for a replacement?

    • Candy says:

      She’s probably just prepping a back up plan just in case. You should talk with her and make sure all her needs are being met (financial and otherwise) too make sure there is no need for her to look elsewhere.

      withsomesugarontop.com

    • rembodler says:

      Great questions – but I think it depends…
      I always assume – no matter what they say – they are seeing someone else or have a boyfriend. “Everybody lies” (C). So to me it does not matter.
      Now imagine you know for certain she is seeing someone – how it makes you feel? If it does not bother you, do not rock the boat and do not challenge her. Keep things as they are. If she ends up with someone else, well, then you can go back to the fun place SA is and find yourself another one.
      However, if her being with someone else when you are being exclusive with her bothers the bejeezus out of you – you have to tell her that and listen to what she says. Ask her what’s up with that SA thing. Then really listen. Depending on whether she will say she will stop or insist on her right to keep looking – make up your mind.

    • Anonymous_SSSD says:

      Happens all the time. If they’re updating their profiles and changing pics then they’re looking for another SD. No question about it. You have only so many choices. 1) Deal with it and plan on some sloppy seconds. 2) Cut her loose and move on. 3) Have a conversation with her as to why. Maybe she needs a salary increase? No matter what though…Never expect monogamy by either party in these arrangements. Just a fact of life.

    • Anonymous says:

      Are you married @Seattle?
      Because in that case it would be understandable for her to want to have a back up plan.

      Always a risk at the background of the wife finding out and being dumped right away!

    • Jaybird923 says:

      @Curious If you’re happy and have no plans of replacing her why were you on SA?

      • Anonymous says:

        Checking on her?

      • Curious in Seattle says:

        @Anonymous and Jay
        Yes, I am snooping on her, guilty as charged.
        There is actually an interesting story behind it, it happened by accident. Someone sent me an email to the address connected to my old SA account. When I went to read it, there were a bunch of SA alerts, some very recent. I was puzzled, since I stopped using that old account long ago, about the time when my wife and I got separated. So I got curious about these messages and opened them. And realized I can use it to check my SB’s account – without her knowing.
        At that time she has not visited it since we started the arrangement. That is how I know that she stopped. That is also how I now know that she started again. And that is also why I am fairly certain that she thinks I am clueless – she must be able to see my current account in plain view that I have not visited in a couple months!

      • Jaybird923 says:

        There’s a reason people always advise you against snooping. You were perfectly happy and now you’ve created an unnecessary problem for yourself. Talk to her but don’t mention anything about this. Just ask her if she’s happy… very simple and listen to what she says.

        There might be absolutely nothing wrong she just might feel that she can get more from someone else or since you guys never discussed being exclusive, she might feel that you guys have a predictable enough routine now and she’s feeling more secure about adding another SD into the mix.

    • The Real Dave says:

      don’t get emotionally involved unless both parties are indicating a more than romantic interest . mine says to me :” are you done with me ?” after we have sex , or she gets insecure about me showing up for dates , I like her but I’m willing to cut her loose if need be .

    • TVC15 says:

      If you never agreed on monogamy, there’s no reason for her not to do what she’s doing. If you want her to be monogamous, say so… but you may have to pay for it.

      • Fundude says:

        LOL TVC you’re posting again without being “anonymous”.

        How sweet of you.

      • The Real Dave says:

        @tvc if a male cuts off a female is that considered rape ?

      • Anonymous says:

        @Fundude do you imagine @TVC in ur dreams too?
        I have posted several times where u called me her and I am not.

      • Anonymous says:

        I see they lifted TVCs ban hahaha

      • FatB'StardSA says:

        @TVC15

        I think you are too good for this blog, you need to focus posting on reddit where you will be appreciated.

        Have a nice day :-).

      • Fundude says:

        @FB

        Unfortunately, she hasn’t been appreciated by the younger SBs over there lol

      • Anonymous says:

        Oh really?
        Haven’t seen anything on Reddit blog of what you are stating here. Not about TVC, not about Elaine. As a matter of fact, wasn’t it you who got blocked because you offended a black moderator with your racism insults?
        You’re a sad person “doctor” Fundude. Trolling numerous blogs with your ignorant nonsense and insults. You must have a very miserable life and very few “patients”, taking in consideration all time you spend trolling.
        You’re a joke “Doctor” Fundude, a sad clown and pitiable attention seeker.
        Grow up and get a life!

      • Anonymous says:

        ha! agree w/ that. What I did see on reddit were assclowns that sounded just like fundude and they were being called out and shut down. Their nonsense isn’t put up with over there.

  107. Fundude says:

    Where’s MMA faggot?

    I miss him. This place is getting boring lol

  108. rembodler says:

    I am just surprised all female bloggers are oh-so-fast to gee advice “next him and move on”. Have you been there in their bedroom, holding the candle?
    She just told you “we got along so well on that trip”. If he is such an asshole, how is that possible?
    Women here sound like it is OK to treat men like a dirty ATM – with gloves and contempt, but OK as soon as it is spitting money out. And if the “Machine” malfunctions, go to the next one.
    SDs are humans, they could have their moments. It is your – ok, you do not like the word “job” – it is your role, your part in the arrangement to make his experience sublime, even if he has “problems” in the bedroom. It should never get to a fight stage. If he is being too impatient, use your mouth, your other skills while you are getting yourself ready. Communicate.
    Occasional hiccups are ok, and if you like the guy otherwise, work with him and refine your craft of being a woman. Blogettes here are very eager to call a man asshole for having a penis (having a penis means he has to be a dick).

    • Anonymous says:

      Where have you found this info? :-)

      “Blogettes here are very eager to call a man asshole for having a penis (having a penis means he has to be a dick).”

      • rembodler says:

        You are right…that was not put together very well.
        I should have stayed with “blogettes here are very eager to call man a dick simply cuz he has a penis…” ;-).

    • Fundude says:

      That is why most of the younger SBs on reddit who aren’t jaded like the older/less desirable SBs that post here speak more of the truth.

      They readily admit they are ultimately trading sex for money in these “arrangements”. They are willing to have sex with significantly older men for the money, even when not sexually attracted to them.

      Both SDs and SBs are replaceable depending on market conditions. However, since SBs are significantly more replaceable than SDs on this website, the SDs have the advantage in that game.

      Ergo, the SDs need to utilize their bargaining power to obtain arrangements they desire.

      • Anonymous says:

        So obsessed by older SBs…
        Are you a cud in the closet?

      • Anonymous says:

        It’s all a scam to try to shame girls into accepting less money. How sad for them in that no one reads their nonsense and even if a couple do stop by here no one pays attention after seeing the BS. They self sabotage and it is kinda funny.

      • Anonymous says:

        He is not offering ANY money, as he is no SD.

        And no, it’s not kinda funny, it’s kinda sad!

      • Anonymous says:

        sounds like he is trying to manipulate the conversations to suit his goal which appears to be to put down the girls and make them feel as if they have no choice or should accept low or minimal allowances. It is quite obvious.
        And yea it’s sad. That much goes without being said. by being funny is that anyone with an IQ over their shoe size can see through it.

      • A Nonnymouse says:

        You forgot to mention that they also ask for more money from someone who is “a total dick or shallow”. Someone calling himself “sexydude” (snicker) on the reddit forum asked whether SBs ask for more money from older and less attractive guys. At least half the answers came back saying that they were far more repelled by assholes.

        I don’t think “sexydude” got quite the answer he was looking for. *snicker*

        Probably explains why some “dudes” here aren’t doing as well as ole franky….haha.

    • Jaybird923 says:

      No one said anything about leaving him because his “equipment” doesn’t work properly. She was advised to leave because

      1) he’s trying to pressure her into unprotected sex when she’s clearly against it.

      2) Trying to have sex with her without taking the necessary steps to make sure she’s ready. And yes I read your comment below it has nothing to do with pleasing her it’s unfortunately a necessary evil. Even with lube with out proper Arousal sex can be painful/uncomfortable. There are a lot of things that happens to the female body that can’t see in order for everything to go off without a hitch. It always surprises me how little grown men (and some women) know about the vagina. Wet doesn’t equal ready to go.

      3) He got angry and hostle with her for his problems.

      • Anonymous says:

        “He got angry and hostile with her for his problems.”

        And that raises the question if has a red or a blue pill problem. 😉

      • Jaybird923 says:

        At this point it seems to be both a red and blue pill problem. If he would’ve taken a blue pill beforehand he wouldn’t have a need for the red one…

  109. problem is says:

    sure would be nice to have a place somewhere between the pansy bs practiced on reddit and the over the top fake brah brag evolved here. I’m not the only one to see the shyiet, so why feed it, cheezits!!

  110. Women are getting worried now. There is a campaign against sex robots . haha..

    campaignagainstsexrobots___org/the-asymmetrical-relationship-parallels-between-prostitution-and-the-development-of-sex-robots/

  111. pain in canada says:

    Flew out to see a SD. We got along so well on the trip and then the last night, he got upset because I was in pain from s3x. I rarely have s3x and so I get too tight and it can be painful until warmed up (it is a muscle, afterall). He actually had ED issues and it dies quickly. He wanted us to originally not use condoms, which caused a fight, but I stood my ground. Last night, I was in pain (no foreplay on me to warm me up…) when trying it and he ripped the condom off, made a comment saying I am acting like I have never had sex before, and gave the silent treatment. I ended up sleeping in the bathroom. He was angry and irritated and I did not want to be around that. WOULD YOU be upset and throw a fit if your SB had painful sex? Have you dealt with this before? I wish he would have just taken it slower, but I guess we were running against the clock of his .. Body.

    • pain in canada says:

      I tried typing it as s3x if there were filters for comments..

    • The Real Dave says:

      sex was painful for you because you’ve had too many condom wearing dicks inside of you . you’re allergic to latex .

      • Anonymous says:

        What is wrong with a person, to want to give these kind of answers to normal questions?

      • Anonymous says:

        It is a troll. We have a few here, unfortunately.

      • Anonymous says:

        Ok, a troll, but there is a person behind that keyboard, typing these things.
        What the fuck is wrong with those people?!?!
        Why would any sane, happy, intelligent person want to be a troll?

      • Anonymous says:

        Why would any sane, happy, intelligent person want to be a troll?

        ——————————————————-

        You answered your own question unless you meant it as rhetorical.

      • Anonymous says:

        It was rhetorical.

        I can only feel deep pity for them.
        This is so sad…..

      • Anonymous says:

        They truly are and need help. They hate women so much but all that hate is going to shorten their lifespan.

        Others enjoy pretending to be sd’s and make reference to laughable low money they pay their prostitutes’ charade as sbs. Fantasy lies or the girl bolts after 30 minutes or as soon as paid.

        If you want information an actual arrangements this ain’t the place to be.

      • Anonymous says:

        Then what is this place good for?
        For some pathetic losers to get rid of their frustration?
        Correct me if I’m wrong please, but isn’t this supposed to be a sugarblog?

      • Anonymous says:

        Always fun to watch someone talk to themselves

      • Anonymous says:

        No darling that is your tactic not mine. Those that drop by here from the site must wonder what the wholly hell is going on in this place.

    • Jaybird923 says:

      Don’t listen to stupid asshole below.Sex is painful for almost every woman if there is no warm-up. Our bodies aren’t designed to operate without it and a grown man that age should know that by now. Don’t let the experience bother you just move on and find a SD for whom sex is about giving and receiving pleasure not just getting his dick wet.

      • pain in canada says:

        Thanks. It was a confusing experience. I can’t believe he never gave foreplay on me lol. SDs tend to love giving…
        Guess I should give guys a warning and prepare next time.

    • The Real Dave says:

      honey it’s your obligation to raw dog that cahk. condoms are useless . quit being a prude

    • Anonymous says:

      Good thing he didn’t push it in or he might have ripped you. If he tries that again go to the police.

    • Nameless says:

      pain in Canada I am sorry your experience was so bad I hope you don’t think sugar daddies behave like this is an action of a john as jay has mentioned just move on there are better men available

    • rembodler says:

      “…he wanted us originally not to use condoms, caused a fight, stood my ground”

      That is ludicrous. Are you both teenagers? This is an arrangement, not two people who just met in a bar and did not have time to discuss sex b4 they are in front of a bed…
      That had to be ironed out. If you warned him about condoms, he should know what the deal is and not ask. there should be no fight and no standing one’s ground. Unless you changed your mind last moment.
      There is a secret known as lube. Use it.

      • Anonymous says:

        There is a secret known as foreplay. Use it.

      • rembodler says:

        It is not his job. You all whine about salty daddies and want to make 5k over the weekend. These are men who have choices. Sure, you can next him, but there are just that many men with money, to next. You all claim to be sexual Goddeeses who know how to keep men coming back to you. If you also want to be pleased and entertained, find a boyfriend.

      • pain in canada says:

        He said I “looked clean” and he was too. I said… I dont care. The condom is on until tests are shown. Lube was available. The last instance happened really fast, so lube wasnt used properly. Seriously, insertion was within 2 minutes.

      • Anonymous says:

        Rem has no knowledge of how women operate. They don’t operate on visual features but mental. Take notes remmy.

      • Anonymous says:

        I have been lurking for a while before posting, but it looks like I read another blog as some here.
        @Rembodler @Fundude and @Real Dave resolutely quote things I have NEVER read before here.

        -You all whine about salty daddies and want to make 5k over the weekend?
        -All the blogettes decided to play sherlock holmeses and hercule poirots, calling her out on being a man?
        -@TVC, DamnVixen and numerous Anonymous bragging here about 10k/month platonic
        -because you’ve had too many condom wearing dicks inside of you . you’re allergic to latex

        Where do they get their information?
        They must have a very rich imagination or a very poor real life….

      • Anonymous says:

        “You all claim to be sexual Goddeeses“

        Where, where? :-)

    • Promise says:

      Have you tried touching yourself before you do it?

  112. Anonymous says:

    {{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H202k7KfZL0}}Does this answer your questions, ye old graceful folks? Or, Confuse you to oblivion?

  113. Anonymous says:

    Imagine the desperate pit this pathetic ‘woman’ has taken. It must take a combination of slutty, depressive, ugly and over the top to be that kind.

    4100896

    • Jaybird923 says:

      We’ve seen her already she posted on a blog a couple of months ago…

      • Anonymous says:

        @ Jay
        Why defend anyone or anything here? For you, you may be winning! Which in it’s own self is like slight of “righteousness”, but for the rest who post, read, or attempt to commit a comment is an attempt of vanity here. Rightly so, it is not what the masses profess is the outcome, while they wait… biting hands and feet, on their nails to be posted. Seriously, think of the impression and the market that you have access to?

        The influence? I shouldn’t even have to question you Love. I have consoled myself many a nights upon your very own words. When none else can be deciphered, you were one of the few that had an influence of depth. With that being said, your market is broad in my humble opinion.

        If it is not, then it certainly could be, based on what the company desires to stand for. =Since you are a leading candidate that has held the test of time…ah hem, would you like to confront the powers that be? or should all readers just resort to reddit and say in a slag-on, jargon tense of speech: “that yeah,ya’ll,we red’dit” , “what’s up?”

        Do you see the confusion and the crowd amoungst all that you encompass? It is vast Love…VAST.

    • Anonymous says:

      please do not post others’ profiles on the blog.

  114. The Real Dave says:

    assuming rejectmma is a social justice warrior , he sure is doing a bad job defending his brethren , homosexuals ( he called me a faggot) and he threatened to rip fundudes face off ( rape)

  115. The Real Dave says:

    speaking of sugar or dating … so I got this one who messaged me first from Nassau New Providence . her first message to me is ” hi I bet you won’t respond because I’m young and I’m looking for love ” … so I did respond and ask her why she said that . she said that nobody on the site is looking for love . so I asked her why is she looking for love on SA . she said because it’s free and she can’t afford match.com . you guys believe her ?

    • Anonymous says:

      And match isn’t free? I thought it was. Well, no matter if we believe her or not, what does she have to lose, if after all she’s looking to lure a rich millionaire into marriage. She might or might not be marriage material though.

      • The Real Dave says:

        I’m far from a rich millionaire . my true salary is listed on my profile . match is not free , both for men and women .

  116. Jaybird923 says:

    @Remmy did you go over to Reddit and reincarnated as the King of Thebes

    • rembodler says:

      Chess problems – Solus rex (or rex solus)
      When either color (though usually Black) has only their king left.The term is derived from Latin and literally means “lone king”… Yea…I have a fondness for Greek mythology…;)).

  117. The Real Dave says:

    the clitoris gestapo is goose stepping looking for people’s addresses .

  118. Anonymous says:

    Classy pics are always a plus.

    ea1cda6e

  119. Midwestmma says:

    Fundude. Give me your address chump. So I can come and rip off your face. You and your faggot dave. I can kick both your asses at one time.

    • Fundude says:

      Address lol

      Brah, if you ever came to my address in a hostile manner, you would just be shot. I don’t play around if someone comes at me in that manner.

      Troll get lost. Show up next Friday or STFU faggot.

      • Jaybird923 says:

        Fundude stop fucking with that newbie SB on Reddit That man is not going to give her any kind of allowance and you know it. It’s one thing for you spout your stupidity on the blog and another thing for you to intentionally try to harm someone. You’re crossing a line.

      • Fundude says:

        @jaybird

        I told her that! I clearly said he can ghost on her, is she getting it upfront?

        Read my FUCKING POSTS!

      • Jaybird923 says:

        You said all that after I posted or I wouldn’t have said anything. What you were telling her before was that he was young and attractive and she had a lot of competition and if she didn’t put out she would miss out.

        unlike you I don’t ignore what is clearly written or try to skew them to mean something else

      • Fundude says:

        @jay

        After I read she never has been to his company or met any employees, it was clear that he was a fraud.

        Before that, he appeared to be “rich” in his 30s. He would be a hot commodity at that point.

      • Jaybird923 says:

        He didn’t appear to be any such thing. Even without knowing that it was readily apparent that he was a fraud. No legit SD tell you that because you don’t want to fuck him on the first meet that he’s moving your meet and greet so he can meet someone else in your place. That’s just a scare tactic designed to make you doubt yourself

        And the line about no hookers is the number one tactic for scammers. It’s all over those how to scam SB blogs.

    • Promise says:

      Go away! If you wanna fight so bad go fight a bear!

  120. Anonymous says:

    @Fundude

    How will the man find you, if he cannot recognize you since you don’t have a face pic or you don’t give out your name, should he give a picture of your body to find you or ask for a guy who goes by ‘fundude’?

    • Fundude says:

      Yeah basically.

      I have no information about him besides “mmadude” from reddit.

      I’ll just tell the owner if some pussy old White guys comes by that wants to fight next Friday, he can give me a call.

  121. Catcher 22 says:

    FLASH. YouTube video now going VIRAL. Some shirtless idiot dressed only in plaid boxer briefs is parading around Chicago handing out VOTE HiLLARY campaign literature and shouting VOTE HILL. WE ALSO GET BILL. Whacko actually claims to be a medical doctor.

  122. rembodler says:

    While Dave and Co are certainly an overreaction, I think the blogettes are equally guilty in chasing “normal” people away. The last normal person who showed up here was Aurore. Someone who did not profess her disdain for all Mankind and love for His money at the same time. Just based on that alone, all the blogettes decided to play sherlock holmeses and hercule poirots, calling her out on being a man. I admit, after @TVC, DamnVixen and numerous Anonymous bragging here about 10k/month platonic, I also thought that a “normal woman” posting here must, just must be a man.
    At least I apologized…

    • Jaybird923 says:

      Now you’ve decided to join fundude and start making up things that never happened. ONE Bloggette, an anonymous, and you accused her of being a man.

      • rembodler says:

        I thought that was more than that…

      • Fundude says:

        @Rem

        The old SBs bluff have already been called on Reddit.

        The place has some semblance of normalcy, albeit its over regulated for my taste.

      • Jaybird923 says:

        Nope just YOU and YGTBKM

      • rembodler says:

        @Jay
        Ok, you win. One very vocal blogette…;)).
        But we certainly do not have any new female “faces” here. Just bitching anons. And, I suppose we won’t. And we all know why.

      • Jaybird923 says:

        @remmy You win is my second favorite phrase… You’re right is number one Just a little FYI :-)

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        Aurore is a man, and you and your comments, Rem, are highly questionable. Either you are an idiot (it’s trending, so quite possible), or youve some other motive.

        And i have absolutely no problem apologizing, being corrected, or correcting myself when Im wrong. It just so happens that Im right most of the time.

        Id tell you to have a nice day, but you deserve to stick with the day you are having. You and the rest of les miserables.

    • Anonymous says:

      You suspected her of being a man too, and it was just you and YGBKM. She came here with her Macy’s items lol. Most normal people who come for sound advice have been chased away by the trolls of this blog.

    • Anonymous says:

      rembodler says:
      February 26, 2016 at 3:19 pm
      While Dave and Co are certainly an overreaction, I think the blogettes are equally guilty in chasing “normal” people away. The last normal person who showed up here was Aurore. Someone who did not profess her disdain for all Mankind and love for His money at the same time. Just based on that alone, all the blogettes decided to play sherlock holmeses and hercule poirots, calling her out on being a man. I admit, after @TVC, DamnVixen and numerous Anonymous bragging here about 10k/month platonic, I also thought that a “normal woman” posting here must, just must be a man.
      At least I apologized…

      Everything about that post was a lie. I still fail to see where any sbs here have said they received 10k a month. Can you cite examples since you say there are so many? Funny since u are the one calling out ‘liars’ and he is the biggest liar of all.

      Here is a clue why no new ‘faces’ come here bc of people like yourself, fundude and therealdave trolling anyone normal. Plus, you enjoy crawling under people’s skin. u must be very unhappy person.

  123. The Real Dave says:

    @fundude the mma toddler is trying to rope you into revealing your personal information . don’t fall for it .

    • Fundude says:

      @Dave

      I have already given him a gym to meet next Friday in Holland.

      That is the extent of my involvement with this weak faggot. I promise he won’t show up lol

      • Promise says:

        Neither will you. >:(

      • Fundude says:

        @Promise

        99.99999% chance I won’t have to lol

      • The Real Dave says:

        alright man. don’t let these freaks of nature get to you. there’s no reforming modern day feminazis and their mangina sympathizers. it is what it is.

      • Fundude says:

        @Dave

        Not at all man.

        I’m going to be in Holland MI next Friday anyway. So if he ever came by, they could give me a call and I’ll come to meet.

        Im definitely not going out of my way lol

        The chances of that are less than .00001% he would show, so why would I travel to meet him?

      • Jaybird923 says:

        ROTFLMAO NOo you didn’t you posted a link to some facebook page saying you’d be there on Friday. What a cop out! Only an idiot would take that seriously.

      • Anonymous says:

        Lol he is a mangina for wanting to fuck up fundude’s face for being disrespectful? That is the most manly he can get.

      • Fundude says:

        @Jaybird

        That is an MMA gym in Holland MI and I know the owner.

        If he wants to come by, no problem.

        He asked for a “time and place”. He has now gotten both.

      • Promise says:

        Please don’t go. :.(

      • Fundude says:

        This is the faggots message to me on reddit:

        “I’ll fight you i at the mma gym of your choice. 5 minutes. Full gear.
        Name the time and place.”

        I have provided that lol

      • Jaybird923 says:

        No you haven’t but I’m not surprised this would be your approach. :-) It’s cowardly cop out.

        That’s like if a guy asks me out and I send him a picture of an out of state restaurant and tell him I’ll be in the area friday have the hostess call when you get there. ROTFLMAO Would you show up? unless you’re an idiot the answer is probably no but then I could say well I scheduled a date but you didn’t show.

      • Fundude says:

        @jaybird

        Except you would have talked to the person on a phone, exchanged photos, etc. before setting that up.

        Im not inclined into doing anything more for some anonymous poster.

      • Jaybird923 says:

        no I wouldn’t have. lol so you only ask out girls that you’ve done all those thing with?

      • Anonymous says:

        Set up a skype call you both can see each other and know what you look like without exchanging data or names, and then you meet at the gym. Solved.

      • Fundude says:

        @Jay

        Yes. I exchange photos, numbers, etc with girls I go out on dates with lol

      • Jaybird923 says:

        There you go again. LOL I specifically said girls you ask out not girls you go on dates with but nice try :-)

        Just admit you bit off more than you could chew this time and we can all drop this. He called your bluff…

      • Fundude says:

        @Jay

        LOL

  124. Marketing says:

    We consider a name change for this blog in: “Let’s Talk Red Pill”.

    We feel this covers the content in a more accurate way, it suits better to the needs of majority of posters and it will create less confusion for the people coming here and naively expecting to find useful information about the sugar lifestyle.

    Please let us know your thoughts about the matter!

  125. Midwestmma says:

    Fundude. I’ll come to Michigan too. Respond to my Reddit message with your info chump. Bring dave the dwarf too.

    • Fundude says:

      Haven’t gotten any messages on reddit brah

    • Fundude says:

      Your the beta faggot making threats online.

      So the onus is on your old weak ass to provide your information to allow me to determine if its worth it.

      But I’m confident you’re a joke that is some reddit nerd that is wasting my time lol

      • Anonymous says:

        Don’t be a pussy dude, the man just challenged you.

      • Fundude says:

        What challenge?

        This is some anonymous reddit nerd who made some vague statement about “meeting me in Chicago” without any specifics about his information/pics/location/etc.

        If I was going to “challenge” someone online seriously, that would be the least I would do.

        Since I know online “duels” are just nonsense from keyboard warriors, I am just calling his bluff to prove his just some reddit troll.

        You honestly think I’m going to run around Chicago looking for some random ghost?

        Ergo, its not real but some random words.

      • Jaybird923 says:

        Weak Fundude. very weak…. ROTFLMAO This proves we were right all along :-)

        If you want to call his bluff give him your info if he doesn’t show or initiate further contact then we’ll see who was the keyboard warrior.

      • Anonymous says:

        He said he’ll come to you since you’re scared of him and his goons.

      • Fundude says:

        {{https://www.facebook.com/225019774201255/photos/pb.225019774201255.-2207520000.1456527466./610709122298983/?type=3&theater}}

        I’ll be in Holland Michigan next Friday. I know the owner of the place.

        Just let me know when you can come by.

      • Fundude says:

        @Jaybird

        I have posted a “time and place” for him.

        Now I’m done with this nonsense because we both know he is all talk.

        Let him bring his “goons” too lol

    • Promise says:

      You’re a bad person.

    • Fundude says:

      {{https://www.facebook.com/CFFO-of-Holland-Misfit-MMABoxing-Center-225019774201255/?fref=photo}}

      Ill be in Holland Michigan next Friday. Let me know when you come by. I know the owner.

  126. rembodler says:

    I am not really sure why passions run that high on the “lifestyle expectations”. If an SB put herself for practical and is overwhelmed with offers – I am sure she will figure out very quickly to up her number. If, on the contrary, she put herself for Substantial and did not get any takers…she can either make money as she is now, as a Walmart greeter or astronaut, or lower her expectations…
    No matter what we on the blog say, it is not decided here. However, we can share our experience, that is what the blog was intended for.
    What is happening to blog now, well… It is s whole different story.

    • Fundude says:

      So true.

      That was the intention of the blog.

      However, as you know, whenever some SB comes on here (usually older, BBW, etc) to bitch about how there are all “salty” SDs on SA, the place devolves.

      You really can’t explain to them the SMP valuations and supply/demand curves.

      When they don’t get that “substantial” allowance, they won’t have introspection into the process.

      They will just bitch about evil SDs, “salty” SDs, “misogynistic” SDs, etc.

      Whoever tells them otherwise will be insulted and the conflict will ensue.

  127. The Real Dave says:

    on match.com and irl women play games by stringing men along on “friendly” dates and play on games . they will even go on 3 or more dates with men eve of they have no intention of being romantically involved with them .

    on Seekingarrangement.com women send
    men countless b.s. messages asking for an
    arrangement and get upset when men do not
    answer , “low ball” them , scam them, or don’t show up for dates .

    the playing field is level .

  128. The Real Dave says:

    I’m about as obsessed with Elaine as I am with this mornings breakfast. it was tasty for a minute and it just recently left my vicinity this afternoon . I’m now relieved .

    • Fundude says:

      Elaine already got her ass booted from reddit by the younger SBs.

      She’s in limbo now. I expect her to return in the next few weeks with her mythical arrangement nonsense and older woman value rhetoric that got shut down on reddit.

      • The Real Dave says:

        all I would have to do is send Elaine a message asking her out to a sex and the city theme based party and that I will pay her with a stack of Michael Jackson twenties neatly tucked in a white envelope that wiffs of cheap body spray . she’d be all over that .

      • Fundude says:

        LOL HA HA HA HA

        Dave just gets better and better around here

      • Anonymous says:

        Is lying your fav past time activity dude? She was scolded for her tone, judging someone for having sex with her SD despite not being attracted to him, not for younger/older discussion. Do you really think people won’t check reddit and see the discussion you lying manipulative prick?

    • Anonymous says:

      So that’s why you and @Fundude are constantly talking about her since she left! She seems to make you very hungry. LOL
      Secret crush on older ladies?

  129. Fundude says:

    @MidWest Beta Faggot

    Still waiting on those pics brah and information.

    What am I going to say? Im looking for “MidWestMMA” guy from reddit when I travel to Chicago?

    Betas gonna beta

  130. Anonymous says:

    Yeah, not really. Once you surpass your 30s you can’t get younger pussy let alone much younger pussy. a 65 year old guy can be single and still get no pussy unless he offers plenty of cash and other benefits. Otherwise, what’s in it for the woman, fucking sagging skin?

  131. The Real Dave says:

    woman kills herself after boyfriend dumps her. he found texts showing that she was using him for his money .

    dailymail dot com
    /news/article-3443722/University-professor-s-daughter-hanged-boyfriend-dumped-text-message-saying-d-end-relationship-d-spent-2-000-21st-birthday.html

    • Anonymous says:

      Why do you post news like this here, what relation does this have with sugar retard?

    • KnownAim says:

      They just can’t get relaxed about having to pay. Frankly, what other uses do guys have? Not many, unless they can get planning permission and build you a house.

      • Click says:

        What good is sexism of either flavour?

      • KnownAim says:

        Sexism = lack of fair exchange; so women prefer money and men prefer sex ….. personally I see nothing whatsoever wrong with that, as long as guys provide as per old fashioned marriage contract – house, food, clothing. Ok, it can be modernised to include a nice car and tennis lessons 😉

      • Fundude says:

        @KnownAim

        No the older traditional contract was a woman who was subservient to the male, cooked, cleaned, took exclusive care of the kids. Not just “sex”.

        Sex is cheap

      • Anonymous says:

        Yes, just sex because women don’t even give that up on marriage. Sex isn’t cheap, unless you refer to your weekly brothel vists and drug fixes. Women have been taking care of kids, even more so than men that’s why the courts are in favour of women in custody battles. As for cooking, cleaning is that really hard nowdays? Most women wash the dishes, I don’t know any men who do that and cooking is a mutual activity I mean you gotta eat as a bachelor too.

        These roles all have changed since women started working alongside men and not having enough time to do stuff like that (which is basically useless in a modern world) but earning a lot to contribute to the household.

  132. Anonymous says:

    Why are @Fundude and @Dave constantly talking about @Elane? Obsessed much?

    • KnownAim says:

      Maybe because one does not have to be 18-25 to look like Kate Moss etc (actually she was 40+ a while back), or have those same measurements. The truth is guys want, but possibly were fat at school and had problems getting girls generaly …. so kind of vent it now all over again. I hear guys gushing about women much older than 30 being super hot …. well, what stops them paying up then? 😀 😀 😀 They can always marry and share half of the net assets and income.

      • Anonymous says:

        How about Kate Beckinsale, Rachel Weisz, Jennifer Connelly, Salma Hayek? They are all naturally beautiful even now that they are older.

      • SugarD says:

        ALL beautiful women were young once

      • Anonymous says:

        Naomi Watts is still fit too.

      • Anonymous says:

        I think certain women have gotten even better as they age. They lose their baby fat and their features become more striking. But to each their own.

      • Anonymous says:

        Jennifer Lopez, Monica Bellucci, Hale Berry, Catherina Zeta-Jones, Christie Brinkley, Penelope Cruz, Angelina Jolie?

      • Anonymous says:

        Penelope Cruz has always been a favourite! Her lips yum!

      • KnownAim says:

        Basically, if one got a wrinkle free baby face and the dudes can’t tell the age, one is totally OK to tell them what they want to hear …. unless they purposefully target 18-25 range for the stupidity factor, they want a girl to be smart, but not really.

      • Click says:

        It’s not the face that gives away the age. It’s usually the build/body. It changes with each decade on a woman.

      • Anonymous says:

        I think I remember one of the older SBs once mentioned she is getting even more male attention now she is older?

      • KnownAim says:

        Wrong, people who work out and eat correctly look a lot younger bod wise. Now I am not talking about clueless runners. That SB possibly got progressively more irritated with more unwanted attention. Who could say no to good treats? Harassment on the other hand …. because now perverts advertised that “women should want sex” since I am not sure how long ago …. 60s? The fifty shades is yet another dollop of the pervert advertising perverts.

      • Click says:

        No, an older person can work out, and it does “help”, but there is still a change in body shaping that happens each decade. You can’t fight that. It’s mostly skeletal.

      • Anonymous says:

        Jennifer Lopez’s skeletal makeup is holding up fairly well LOL!

      • Anonymous says:

        It happens to male and female. Most older men and women lose muscle mass and skin elasticity. As someone else mentioned diet and exercise helps with this.
        I see tons of teens and 20’somethings with love handles and blubber hanging out of their tight jeans. Older and younger women can be very fit if they take care of themselves and work at it. Unless, they have great genetics lucky them but that is rare. Most hot bodies workout at the gym or do sports, so staying active and eating right helps so much no matter what your age.

      • Click says:

        Not really Anonymous. You can see the changes in her skeletal stance. It happens to men and women, and it’s not the end of the world.

      • Anonymous says:

        You need glasses clitk. I dont give a sh** if her skeletal system is different or not but her body looks better than 90% of the women i see around my area.

  133. The Real Dave says:

    for anyone who will take up the challenge from the MMA warrior .
    he likes to be on bottom and enjoys the ground and pound . as fat bastard says ” have a nice day!”

    • KnownAim says:

      As it takes one to know one? Talking from your own experience perhaps? Real alpha dudes do not mind looking after women. Yes, at the end of day this could be described as paying for sex, if one wanted to look at it that way. Actually I do not mind what wannabe alpha omegas call it. At the end of day there is a Mr Big non-entity and the guy who makes great breakfasts, takes the girl to Paris and pays her place in NY as well … … without fretting about whether his dick is big enough or he is paying too much for an over thirty something :p Happens in real life off screen actually.

    • Fundude says:

      His girlfriend is pretty good at ground and pound for free

      • KnownAim says:

        She could be fat and desperate, you know… Fat wimmin often think they have to play mother figure etc

      • Anonymous says:

        He challenged you man. Pussy much?

      • KnownAim says:

        Then also, all kinds of social segments produce some non-fat people even in this day and age, you can totally have an aspiration-less non fat bint who is OK to live on burnt toast. If they were sent to a good school and got a bit of a make over, they might look glossy magazine hot, or at least an office totty hot and learn to speak with a nicer accent. But then the SDs are not exactly looking for druggies or check out girls, I hear …. or maybe they do …. someone has to be accepting “minimal” ….

      • Promise says:

        Stuff like this is why I wish I was your mom so I can spank you.

  134. Promise says:

    FunDude,you’re not gonna fight anybody in Chicago. You’re gonna go to medical school, and leave Elaine alone. And whoever that was that challenged him. You’re horrible.

  135. Anonymous says:

    In all seriousness let’s ask the age old question again:

    WHY THE FUCK IS FUNDUDE ON A SUGAR LIFESTYLE BLOG TROLLING, IS THAT WHAT HE DOES IN HIS FREE TIME AS A ‘DOCTOR’?

  136. Anonymous says:

    This blog is deluded. How can anyone put a price on anyone’s arrangement? They can be different, circumstances, meet ups, and whatever the hell else is involved. Adult people can put up any category they want. Trolls here are acting like children who need a few slaps to get the point across.

    • KnownAim says:

      They’ll just get an odd trump from wallmart or no one at all 😀 😀 If they scam anyone half decent, they would only be more careful next time around …. If they insist on sh*te like minimal AFTER the knickers hit the floor …. that is basically scamming as it is. Only someone retarded would entertain that nonsense. Or indeed if they do not mind very high volume, shall we say.

      • Anonymous says:

        @KnownAim

        Their main goal is to shame women into lowering their expectations bc it infuriates them that women are receiving more than they want or are willing to pay. And they want to pay little or nothing. They slut shame if someone mentions even the cheapest escort in their area receives more per hour than they offer per meet or per p4p for a week–code for john. I saw on this very page a twist turn around how they can get cheaper prices from craigslist, brothels or bp prostitutes.
        Anyone with half a brain can figure out what is going on there.

        I do not agree sugaring with an escort’s protocol, but If you want to read a very good article on feedback from an escort’s perspective of sugar daddy sites then read this:

        {{{http://www.elitecourtesans.co.uk/suzy/do-sugar-daddy-websites-really-work}}}

        What she said rings true in reference to the wannabes and cheap ones. Legitimate sugar daddies exist but better luck meeting one in places where actual wealthy men congregate. The site has no quality control.

      • Click says:

        “The site has no quality control.”

        On either side, unfortunately.

      • Anonymous says:

        I am sure that is the case. I have heard from a few potential SD about that as well.

        It is a numbers game for the site at this point now though, isn’t it?

      • Click says:

        I feel the numbers are just too low on either side now for anyone to be successful. With the amount of time one would have to invest to find that “needle in a haystack”, one is just better off returning to traditional dating, in my opinion.

      • Anonymous says:

        Traditional dating or for sugar relationships go where the men/women are that you want to meet.

      • Click says:

        This exactly, yes.

  137. The Real Dave says:

    you can tell it is feminists and their mangina apologists who push their agendas on here. usually this is how fascism starts . it’s about control . when the fascists lose control they threaten physical violence .

    • Anonymous says:

      You sound really paranoid and scared. They make medications for that but assume you would need a cocktail for your hysteria and insanity.

    • Anonymous says:

      Stop stealing my line. Actually it is you. You don’t say let people be and pay what they pay because each arrangement is different. You want to lower the allowances ultimately, because you’re cheap and have no money. I say make money, come back in 10 years and sugar the right way.

  138. Oasis says:

    Word of the hour: Projection

  139. rembodler says:

    I think if you are willing to pay Moderate and higher you can request extra perks, like unlimited dates, exclusivity, or BDSM if you are into that.
    Other than that, I am not sure what Moderate “buys” you, except entitled attitude that you can do without…

    • Anonymous says:

      What does moderate buy you? More like how can I get a younger, hotter girl 40 years my junior with that. Nobody wants to fuck your wrinkled skin. And stop pushing an agenda.

      • Fundude says:

        Multiple younger SBs on reddit have readily admitted they would bang dudes in their 60s for 2k/month allowances.

        Why do you think Elaine and Jaybird got so upset trying to “slut” shame them?

      • Anonymous says:

        The girls have never slut shamed them lol don’t lie cunt, they always support them, it’s the guys who say they’re cheap and hookers. Read this blog earlier and past blogs.

      • Anonymous says:

        There is no need for the c-word. In all reality there are no SD’s on this forum, anyways. Only those who seek a cheap alternative to an hourly escort that tor are MRA, red pill trolling dorks.

      • Fundude says:

        @TVC

        LOL do you really want me to link it here?

        There was a clear attempt to discourage the younger SBs from taking money for sex with older SDs.

        The younger SBs weren’t having it lol

      • Click says:

        No SBs on here either lol.

      • rembodler says:

        @Idiot anonymous
        It does not matter what that “younger hotter” girl wants. She may want to become an astronaut, for all I care. She can only get what the market allows or be happy with her Walmart greeter job.
        Do not push YOUR agenda, you are a transparent hooker who worries about the market slide. It is obvious.

      • KnownAim says:

        those 2k/month are not for moving in with them …. possibly once a week max

      • Click says:

        TVC’s a hooker? I never knew that. Guess that’s why she hates men so much. That’s too bad.

      • KnownAim says:

        Ah, I long suspected cheap skates on here actually really want/get Wallmart people with no other prospects 😀 😀

      • Anonymous says:

        @Rembitch Read my post again cunt, I never mentioned the market. I said ANYONE CAN DO THE FUCK THEY WANT, if they put a higher category what’s in it for you to argue about it? Idiot, just go with your own category STOP TELLING PEOPLE TO LOWER THEM.

      • Click says:

        So much anger, especially sad coming from a woman.

      • Anonymous says:

        It’s not anger, it’s disappointment. But dismissing that, can’t women get angry too, or you think they’re subhuman somehow? I hate people who have to made decisions for others, just like loser Rem is trying to do. I hate it even more when he’s subliminal with it.

      • Click says:

        Disappointment at what? You’re on a site where men basically purchase women. What kind of men did you expect to find here? All rhetorical questions but worth noting. I think you’re wasting your energy and just making yourself more disappointed. Why not go somewhere where you can find the type of men you’re looking for?

        And no lol, I’m not trying to chase you out. I just hate to see this.

      • rembodler says:

        Women here are the worst. The lack of education. The lack of logic. This leads to them not being able to argue so they scream at you.

      • rembodler says:

        Like, her saying I “make decision for others”. I cannot do that. I can only offer my opinion. It is called a blog. Unfortunately, uneducated women can’t have a civil discourse.

      • Click says:

        “Women here are the worst.”

        Then why stay here? lol

      • Anonymous says:

        Disappointed at the blog and rem and its trolls. Not at SA, there are great men there and I prefer them than dating loser guys my own age.
        Disappointment at what? You’re on a site where men basically purchase women. What kind of men did you expect to find here?

        I don’t see this as a hooker site or an online brothel where men pay or BUY women like meat because slavery is illegal and pressuring someone into sex with money is illegal too.
        I come here for men who need the company of a younger lady and genuinely want to help her, not just get into her past. Most men are respectful on the site, and can’t stand the blog trolls.

        If you really see this site as men ? women for sex, I feel sorry for you.

      • Click says:

        Why would you feel sorry for me? I’m just observing what’s going on.

      • Anonymous says:

        Because you deem SA as a site where men purchase women. This shows your mindset and how fucked up it is.

      • Jaybird923 says:

        @Fundude How was I upset you idiot. I could careless how many men she wants to fuck for money or tor free. I just found it amusing that she got offended when someone said her behavior was hookerish. She is a PRO plain and simple. But for some reason they seem to think if they label themselves a SB even if they do the exact same thing they aren’t escorts.

        The men who would interested in her would not be interested in me. We have different target bases so she and others like her are no competition. But keep trying to twist things around to fit your agenda it’s what you do and not very well.

    • KnownAim says:

      There is not much to argue about – you either can provide a decent lifestyle, or you are kind of impotent in that department. Like your friends FD, RD and Fat Bastard some thing or other. Some women prefer good level of care, if they were to agree to spend their time on you. Market wise, there is market for the moron majority and all kinds of niches, otherwise everyone would shop at walmart and primark.

  140. Fundude says:

    @MidWestFaggot

    You mad brah?

    How come some alpha male is paying 10K to get sex?

    You are probably some fat hill billy with no money. You work as a garbage man or what? Be honest.

    • KnownAim says:

      Actually some guys pay that and more to wives/daughters/girlfriends. There is nothing whatsoever wrong when a guy takes a properly caring attitude, unlike some trash purely looking to get laid for nothing ….

      • Fundude says:

        Only low value men have to spend anywhere near that much.

        Most of the SDs admit far lower numbers per month.

        {{https://www.reddit.com/r/sugarlifestyleforum/comments/47meqm/average_allowance_numbers_and_length_of_allowance/}}

      • Anonymous says:

        These guys don’t make the majority. There are literally countless SDs out there. We all know SD’s who can afford to pay that are a minority but are more valued than the cheaper ones.

      • Click says:

        Countless SDs lol. Couldn’t be more funny. Most women are supporting men now.

    • Anonymous says:

      Alpha men get old too. They are human you know.

  141. The Real Dave says:

    like fat old nasty pussy? we’ve all had to dabble in the heavyweight division a few times but SA has the hottest women in the major cities and they don’t just give it up to everyone . please tell us about all the supermodels lined up outside your door .

    • FatB'StardSA says:

      @Dave

      “fat nasty’s” was referring to me I think…

      “Once I became single, pussy fell out of the sky”

      Did the pigs loose the ability to fly once you became single?

    • Click says:

      This has to be a woman. Everyone knows you can get more pussy from women once you’re attached to one woman.

  142. Midwestmmadude says:

    Fun dude. You got destroyed on the Reddit blog. And looked like a beta chump.

    I’m ready to take you to task in a Mixed martial arts full contact bout in Chicago. Name the time and place. Unless you are again of getting crushed by an older millionaire.

    • The Real Dave says:

      we got a chimpanzee chest beater here to prove his manliness .

      • Anonymous says:

        projection much, chimp chest dave?

      • Midwestmmadude says:

        Dave, you can take the greyhound bus to Chicago and I will take you on in an mma match too.

        You might need to stand on a milk crate to hit me. Beta bait

      • Anonymous says:

        @midwestmmadude
        notice the crickets now. It is much easier to troll and berate women or men they know they will never see from behind their keyboard. such wonderful examples of alphas!

      • Fundude says:

        Bro, he’s some 50 year old clown who pays women 10K for sex (fat, ugly women).

        He’s nothing to worry about lol

      • Anonymous says:

        So meet up with him then. He made a open invitation to meet at a public mixed martial arts venue. Ya scared brah?

      • Fundude says:

        @Anon

        Im going to make a trip to meet some nameless/faceless/physique less dude from Michigan?

        I already asked him on a private message to provide his info

      • Anonymous says:

        Plan the trip when you are in Chicago anyway. I guess the answer is yes, you are scared.

      • The Real Dave says:

        my friend , demonstrating your machismo on the Internet is not impressive . mma in your case means you watch a lot of YouTube videos of cage fighting and wearing Affliction shirts .

      • Click says:

        I know this type. You take him up on his offer and he’ll disappear so fast that he moves a time zone.

      • Anonymous says:

        So much projection today @TheRealdave

    • Anonymous says:

      I doubt he even lives in Chicago. Everything about him is a farce. He is a coward.

      • Fundude says:

        I live in Michigan but travel to Chicago every approximately 3 weeks or so

      • Click says:

        They’re all farces on reddit. Usually just adult kids living in basements and locked in their bedrooms.

      • Fundude says:

        @Click

        He’s a weak clown that kisses women’s ass due to being a low value male.

        You really think some “mma” badass is paying 10K for sex?

        My friend is a 50 year old 6’2″ 240lb MMA dude that trains constantly. His son is well ranked in the amateurs.

        He is a blue collar dude that doesn’t make much money.

        The guy dates women in their 20s for free. He would be embarrassed to pay 10K for sex lol

      • Click says:

        You would think someone could come up with a better fantasy. The MMA part is pass but having to pay $10K for sex makes it default fail. I guess the dude can’t see that. To him it probably kills two fantasies in one, getting pussy and being rich.

        All you can do is laugh at the lack of logic.

    • Anonymous says:

      @FunDude et al.
      Interesting the attempts to write up hard rules for everyone in arrangements where there are none. As in your real life, outside of the anonymity of the internet, am going to guess you are not much in control of making rules for anyone else. So here we are pretending being badasses on the internetz. Only what you come across as in reality are highly insecure and immature losers who try and dictate what other men and women should do via the internetz.

      Anyone with anything to offer would not make it so obvious to others that u are in fact whiny undersexed powerless man children who are defo not getting laid. They call your types internet beta bullies with beta or omega male rage. That is all you are- nothing more nothing less.

      • Anonymous says:

        +1

      • Click says:

        Here we have an example of projection.

      • Anonymous says:

        Anonymous says:
        February 26, 2016 at 7:13 am
        @FunDude et al.
        Interesting the attempts to write up hard rules for everyone in arrangements where there are none. As in your real life, outside of the anonymity of the internet, am going to guess you are not much in control of making rules for anyone else. So here we are pretending being badasses on the internetz. Only what you come across as in reality are highly insecure and immature losers who try and dictate what other men and women should do via the internetz.

        Anyone with anything to offer would not make it so obvious to others that u are in fact whiny undersexed powerless man children who are defo not getting laid. They call your types internet beta bullies with beta or omega male rage. That is all you are- nothing more nothing less.
        ___________________________________________________________________________

        LOL this is so true. These troll nerds need to get some obviously!

      • Click says:

        I’m saving a screen shot of the above post for an example of irony, thanks.

      • Fundude says:

        @TVC

        You came back after reddit’s younger ladies gave your dumbass the boot with Elaine?

        The +1 thing is a dead TVC thing.

      • Anonymous says:

        Click says:
        February 26, 2016 at 9:01 am
        I’m saving a screen shot of the above post for an example of irony, thanks.

        Please learn what irony means and how it applies to your sex life or lack thereof. Your fleshlight and sex doll do not count as getting laid either @Fundude aka click.

      • Anonymous says:

        Just how much live breathing female sex would it take to calm their omega male rage we observe in their trolling?

      • Click says:

        I’m sorry you didn’t understand but I don’t feel like explaining to you Anonymous. It would be boring.

      • Anonymous says:

        Boring. Like ur sex life? ba dam tissss!

      • Anonymous says:

        {{http://www.quickmeme.com/img/d7/d71feb984369cca87fe0e14c4fe5c9dcd1385361fa2cc1ac796a04890bcef2b2.jpg}}

      • Anonymous says:

        imo the most ironic thing about red pillers & MRA’s are that they claim to be so superior and dismissive of women yet they in all their hate and game to hurt women really give women the ultimate power over them. and they are too angry to even realize it.

      • Click says:

        zzzzzzz troll zzzzzzzzzz

      • Anonymous says:

        He projects yet again
        It is the word of the day- Brilliant!

      • Click says:

        Having fun? I hope so.

    • Fundude says:

      Post your pic in your avatar brah.

      You are a blue collar peasant who can’t do shit.

      Keep paying bitches 10K for sex “alpha” male

    • FatB'StardSA says:

      @Midwestmmadude

      If you are willing to pay for my business class plane ticket and 5 star hotel then I am in. I would like to take some pictures of me on the plane and in the hotel room and put them on my SA profile.

      Have a nice day :-).

      • Anonymous says:

        Are you applying to be a long distance SB? Why would he even fight a fattie, you need to exercise honey, lift some and then you can come and take on the challenge like a man.

      • FatB'StardSA says:

        Am looking for a platonic arrangement. Since I have a nice personality my looks do not matter.

      • Anonymous says:

        I doubt you have a nice personality from what we’ve gathered from your posts. Faking a past character, making up lies, using ad hominems, supporting Dave…how worse could you get?

  143. Fundude says:

    TVC and Elaine have been run off the sugar reddit site. Quite amusing actually.

    Both of them came with the “nice girl” act whereby hey were going to “offer advice to younger SBs”.

    Essentially, it was the same nonsense that they shouldn’t have sex with older guys they “don’t find attractive”, yada yada.

    The younger ladies on the blog realized their tactics immediately and shut it down.

    Elaine attempted to the typical “concern troll” tactic in terms of shaming younger women out of the sugar game.

    The younger women just told her to fuck off.

    Elaine then decided to leave due to her dumbass not being able to shame the younger women out of sugar so that her old ass could be competitive.

    Funny times.

    • The Real Dave says:

      I’d rather pay my guy friends for a platonic relationship .

      • Midwestmmadude says:

        Hmmm. Sounds like you are experienced at paying guys.

        Why did you take your picture down? The girls looked taller than you in your picture.

      • The Real Dave says:

        sounds like you’re stalking me . weird man. do you bat for the other team? you shouldn’t talk about my pic when you don’t put one up of your own.

  144. The Real Dave says:

    it seems as though anonymous morphs between the 2 genders quite rapidly . she /it/him should apply for a patent with that revolutionary technology .

  145. Anonymous says:

    Minimal=older than 30 years old, or at least an unattractive younger girl, single mother or non exclusive.
    Practical=same as above just lower the age to 27
    Moderate=average young girl up to 25 years of age
    Substantial=hot young girl up to 25 years of age who is also a student or has a degree, no kids and is exclusive, preferably located in an international city
    High=a young supermodel with a hot body, who is also exclusive, has no baggage, has a career planned or is a student, is exclusive and willing to travel, 1 or 2 boyfriends tops in the past, fairly new to sugar, having had maybe one SD in the past.

    • Fundude says:

      Moderate for any 25 year old?

      Way too high.

      • The Real Dave says:

        moderate is for a girl who has been in beauty pageants , top shelf hot girl in any major city who fvcks you like a pornstar 3 times per day .

        the type of guys who substantial
        and high : cucks, deviant sexual desires , married CEOs , married politicians , and professional athletes

      • Anonymous says:

        Can’t you read it says up to 25 meaning 18-25 a young thin hot girl.

      • Anonymous says:

        25 year olds are hot, they’re in their prime, having completed studies and just started working, no baggage, past boyfriends or kids.

        @The Real Dave I don’t want someone who fucks like a pornstar, has been fucked by many men like a pornstar or resembles a pornstar. Hell no!

    • Anonymous says:

      Now for guys:
      Minimal=any guy who is younger than 30 and up to 35, has no kids, isn’t married and is looking for a friends with benefits type a few times per month.
      Practical=a guy who is up to 45 years of age, can be married, successful in his career, can either be exclusive or non exclusive
      Moderate=married man older than 45 years of age, has some baggage, successful, able to travel, either exclusive or non-exclusive
      Substantial=man who is 55+ and wants a much younger girl, can either be married or not, successful in his career
      High=very rich man who can afford either one SB or many, can be non exclusive and married, with kids and baggage but is successful and usually 60+ years old.

      • Fundude says:

        So essentially, Frank is basically fucked under that analysis lol

      • SugarD says:

        Way off –

        SD gets a pass since he has the money . The following categories must upgrade:
        dog ugly, socially awkward, no Game, obese ,elderly to the point of geezerhood . Who knows @FD ,Frank might have game with the girls. His SB can take one for the team /money

        As we read on Reddit ,some SBs are open about not liking sex with a guy older than 25. So they take one for the team . If my SB doesn’t like sex with me she had better be a great actress.

        Case in point : I am 60s and never pay more than Minimal. When I upgrade to Practical I follow my plan below.

      • Fundude says:

        @SugarD

        Keep up the good work on reddit.

        The younger SBs appear much more honest with price ranges compared to the older ladies we had on here.

        Most of them are admitting a range of 1-3K/month at the most for the vast majority with them lasting mostly 1 to 3 months.

      • Anonymous says:

        I don’t see how Frank is fucked, he is neither ugly nor obese because we can see his pic, he’s just old like SugarD. Based on assumptions both have to shell out allowances of substantial to moderate for girls younger than 25, and practical to minimal for girls over than 28 or 30.

    • SugarD says:

      Way off -here’s how it lays out (I exclude major international cities -which have a +1 premium)
      Free = all SDs under 35. These are BFs

      Minimal = baseline for all SBs with SDs over 35 -4 visits /month

      Practical = upgrade here for exclusive ,under 25 ,above average in all categories -looks,smarts,availability ,no kids-4 visits/month

      Moderate = supermodels usually under 30. Upgrade here for 2 or more visits/week ,over the top sexual service ,GF attitude in other words ,almost perfect for 4 visits/month

      Substantial and High = SD who is dog ugly ,fat ,zero game , more money than common sense ,or SB who is famous or incredibly successful

    • Anonymous says:

      Interesting the attempts to write up hard rules for everyone in arrangements where there are none. As in your real life, outside of the anonymity of the internet, am going to guess you are not much in control of making rules for anyone else. So here we are pretending being badasses on the internetz. Only what you come across as in reality are highly insecure and immature losers who try and dictate what other men and women should do via the internetz. Anyone with anything to offer would not make it so obvious to others that u are in fact whiny undersexed powerless man children who are defo not getting laid. They call your types internet beta bullies with beta or omega male rage. That is all you are- nothing more nothing less.

  146. Anonymous says:

    @ Cryptic Anonymous

    If you want a “scream queen”, I would imagine that you will give her something to scream over!
    Right?, my main man… Dollars don’t make anyone holler anymore. Male nor female.

    You could say a variation of many Benjamin’s, a C-note, Oh my god, my nipples are hard and so and so forth and so on.., or we could escape the ladder of a pre-mi-Donna, and know that much more is to be expected as is much more is to be gained.

    The worst relationships are based on solely financial basis, unless it is what it is. Sometimes, they do turn into more than what one bargained for and are real and true and fake no funk and call all aspects of life out as they should be, to push each party to their heightened potential. They are rare and they do exist.

    If you do not fall prey to victims such as Dave or Fun Dud, then their are men that actually respect women for being up front, personal, real and honest.

    However, if you read the blogs, the word press forums, (Reddit, I imagine, which I have not), I can only presume that all forums predict a life that most think is un-think-able. The only thing in life that is un-thinkable is what one cannot imagine and believe that exists. Ponder, if you will and get back to me.

    Get ready for backlash- b/c I have a long ass comment that will be hater-ized. If not, it will be ignored for truth. What do you think will happen? Skittles commercial, take 15. The new color will be the exciting color of the rainbow tomorrow. lol.

    • Cryptic Anomaly says:

      I’ll respond to the part of your post that I understood, I’m not looking for a scream queen, that said many of the SB’s I have encountered aren’t particularity charming and are obsessed with the money anyway. Once you start doing the math you realize that a brothel is cheaper and easier but also that many of the SB’s are offering the same anyway just at a higher rate and with more drama.

      In terms of what is written on blogs etc, it’s all well and good but how much of it is real and how much fantasy? How difficult is it to “troll” and make people think you are some kind of Uber SD or SB?

  147. Cryptic Anomaly says:

    @Jaybird – Just saw the classifieds, out of 25 ads 13 of them are looking for online, sure a few of those online requests say they will consider real life but obviously that is not what they are hoping for!

  148. rembodler says:

    I cannot but wonder if these “platonic only” 10k/month Reddit/Tumblr SBs ever looked on the SA, what is their competition? The number of able and willing SBs in the “Negotiable/Practical” range – at least in my area – is overwhelming. I want to see all of them…but there are seven days in a week and only that much money. In a way, having the “Moderate-to-High” crowd helps – to rule all of them out.
    That is, until they start messaging, saying that they will “consider” lower allowance…

    • Anonymous says:

      @ Rem

      Sounds like Amy Shumer after all of the comedians she copies decide to go extinct on her and leave her with no material left to stand on and leave her with nothing more than bare bones talent, on her own accord. Let’s see how long she can hold her own without twisting other ideals and there “might” be some raw talent within. Other than that, she is a has been.

      No different than you calling high and low worth of any accolade from one to the other. The high bred women feed off of the low valued ones as if a red cross mobile unit pulled up, so that they could get refueled from their thirst. We all know that a very thin is walked between high dollar and high good received. It is based on quality and quality can be found in low requests as well as high.

      Many people under-value what they offer as well as many over-value what they deliver and leave much to be desired. It is all in perspective. Eh?

      • Anonymous says:

        @ Rem,

        Please keep in mind, I am not “dogging” you out my comment above…^^^ as to what many may conspire to think. I am merely probing you to you rthoughts, based on your comment to mind. Please to not place me nor any more in a “ring with a cage” to “brawl it out” and “tap out”. For those days are truly tiring and un-desired for the ethically sane and sexually enthralled that chose to thrive in this space. I presume that is you and much as it is I. I am not here to bicker and tear down. I am here to mentally ignite, sexually fight for fun to bow down in a yes, daddy. scenario or rather have him on his knees, bequesting “please”.

        Regardless of the circumstance/scenario…A good version is neither one placating the other, but being a sincere force to be reckoned with in a positive facet.

        Do you not just hate hearing that “you are a diamond in the rough”. If such a diamond is in the rough and you, jack city, swing so smoothly, then why do you not educate or facilitate in action on how the so called “diamond in the rough” can and will be polished so smooth with the elements of your touch? See my point, fellow bloggers?

        The point is: If you profess to be such a professor of the SB/SD dynamic/here say that you are attuned into your space/dynamical influence….(cough and hack for a moment to catch my breathe here for the men…)

        Then, if such an above fact is true, then why would you or them or they as a whole, not profess and then show by example, what it is to be what is professed? The same goes for the ladies of this sanctum, so do not get a hard on, thinking that you can call full claim to a one-sided question. Now, now, Hill-Billy babies.. This question goes out to all of the sexy people of the blog, not just one. Answers? Please, let at em’! :)

    • Cryptic Anomaly says:

      Hence why I always tell these women that they have to consider what and who they are competing with, no one is going to want to pay a few hundred or more a week just to have a platonic dinner pal, especially if brothels are cheaper (& legal in the area) or they could even go to strip clubs and spend their night talking to naked women if they really need the conversation that badly.

      • Anonymous says:

        Are you really comparing brothels to a clean, disease free not to mention beautiful and high quality SB who at least is toward getting her degree or already has one?

      • The Real Dave says:

        degree ??? haha men don’t care about your worthless degree in Department Store studies .

      • Anonymous says:

        That means she isn’t a dumb cum dump. Unless you want a bimbo, that’s a fetish and different.

    • Anonymous says:

      What an idiocy. Why should they contact YOU? What makes you that special? You should know hat there are other men who are willing to RAISE their own budget to fit with a good but higher allowance range SB.
      It’s like you’re actively pushing for an agenda, trying to lower their expectations. It’s a free field now, why not try it you say, right?

      • rembodler says:

        I highly doubt that. “Other men” see same as I do – plenty of opportunities that are very reasonable. Most of these women are not really looking for an arrangement, they just hope to win a lottery. As I said before, I have no issues with that, just curious if they even gave it a thought, why no one is running to them…;)).

      • Anonymous says:

        They don’t hope to win a lottery, there are countless rich men in big cities like NY, LA… and they can find them. If they don’t that’s fine too. Why ride the cc with 3 guys at rotation for 2k.
        Most of these SB’s are smart because they don’t want too many SD’s thus one having to pay much more and being exclusive and not doing this after a year or two, as it shouldn’t be a career.

  149. Jaybird923 says:

    Oh my God they have a classifieds section!
    [https://www.reddit.com/r/SugarBaby]

    There are some gems there fellas lol

  150. Jaybird923 says:

    Fundude aka sexydude01 you are a mess

    • Fundude says:

      lol you love it

      • Jaybird923 says:

        @fundude not really it so easy to identify you. What happened to not caring about blogging there because it’s boring? :-))

        @Nameless no I’m not blogging over there. I haven’t posted since I said I was done.

      • Fundude says:

        @jay

        That is because I want to be identified lol

        Want to give the place a second chance but its not too promising.

        Your girls TVC and Elaine have already gotten their asses run off lol

      • Anonymous says:

        If you want to be identified even better, then use more accurate identifiers as screen-names, not ones that are the complete opposite of your actual self as Fundude or sexydude01. Try baldydude01 next time. yw

      • Anonymous says:

        Would fatdelusionaldude work?

      • Fundude says:

        I was thinking big dick dude 01

      • Jaybird923 says:

        She said an ACCURATE identifier Fundude. The big dick thing falls into the same category as being an alpha. if you constantly have to say you have one then you donn’t.

    • Nameless says:

      jay are you straddling the fence blogging on here as well as slf

    • Nameless says:

      jaybird good morning how many from here went to the sugar lifestyle forum I’m reading they’re posts and it’s a large number for them I guess we don’t have a good reputation over there

      • Jaybird923 says:

        Nope we don’t have a good reputation there. but there are a few people participating some of them I recognize their stories but can’t remember their monikers from SA

  151. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Frank95

    Good morning to Australia, I just remembered our discussion about what American means. So I look at your recommended source, Webster. It would seem, that the Spanish speaking peopke you mentioned are simply wrong. So in line with your advice I would suggest for them to petition Webster editors. :-)

    • Frank95 says:

      I don’t recall denying that US citizens call themselves “Murican” nor that a “Murican” dictionary might reflect that.

      On the other hand, that definition only applies within the borders of the USA. Other people living in the continent, such as those speaking Spanish and Portuguese, can also call themselves American if they want. In their countries, their dictionaries rule, not Webster.

      Compare this to the definition of “sugar daddy”, where the definition is the same in Webster, and the Oxford. So, that applies both inside the USA, and in countries where Oxford English is spoken.

      Your point is?

  152. The Real Dave says:

    my best friends sister has a guy who fixes everything in her house on demand. he’s painted walls , installed lighting , fixed appliances for 2 years . she’s never fvcked him once . betas are the root cause . they affect the rest of us tremendously and we don’t realize it because most of us don’t have betas as friends

    • Cryptic Anomaly says:

      White Knights and Mangina’s need to be extracted from the gene pool.

    • Anonymous says:

      SO fixing stuff for a friend would immediately mean that she has to fuck him because she OWES him? Nah bitch, nobody owes you sex, it’s something you give when you are in love or attracted to someone, not because someone did a fence paint job. You are the biggest idiot I have ever encountered online. You write gibberish. I wonder, if you fuck your technician or tech friend too who fixes your computers because you owe him?

  153. Fundude says:

    Interesting article on why post wall bitches don’t deserve “nice guys”:

    {{http://thoughtcatalog.com/leo-steven/2014/04/dear-girls-who-are-finally-ready-to-date-nice-guys-we-dont-want-you-anymore/}}

    • Cryptic Anomaly says:

      $240 that is what it costs for an hour of sex in a brothel down here, some are even cheaper. At that price it is cheaper to pay for it then it is to chase women in the hope of getting it for “free”. I don’t care if they are pre or post wall either, just not worth the time and energy.

      • Fundude says:

        I agree with that assessment.

        Some faggot White Knight named “MidWestSD” attacked me in a private message on the sugar blog from reddit.

        This pussy thought he was some kind of alpha despite paying some bitch about 10K to bang.

        Does that sound alpha to you? LOL

      • Cryptic Anomaly says:

        $10,000 is about 41 visits to a brothel, 41 different women if you so choose, no dinners, no chatting, no gifts, no dramas, just sex.

        Some men are Magina’s, they think they are providing some kind of service by taking care of women and spending big on them. You’re right it’s not Alpha behaviour, they are being servants.

      • Nameless says:

        10k will buy a lot of pussy in any country

      • Anonymous says:

        I wonder what happened to you CA? You didn’t use to post stuff like this before some people left the blog? I guess you just want to bust a nut huh, psycho?

      • Anonymous says:

        Nameless shut your trap you little shit, why didn’t you talk the same talk and walk the shame walk back when dinosaurs walked this blog? If you want a brothel hey, by all means go there get your diseases and drug fix and leave SA alone. It even says so in the beginning of the registration place.

        IF YOU THINK OF SA AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO A BROTHEL YOU’RE DEAD WRONG AND ULTIMATELY DISRESPECTING ALL THE PEOPLE WHO TAKE PART IN IT, MEN OR WOMEN.

      • Nameless says:

        anon I was responding to posts above if you had taken the time to read them you would know they weren’t talking about arrangements but brothels if you have 10k you can get a lot of pussy for that in those places and for your information I don’t use hookers escorts or brothels I have no idea what you’re talking about

    • FatB'StardSA says:

      @FunDude

      An interesting topic, even if off topic! Time to get SERIOUS!

      I am actually happy that there are men who marry the “post wall bitch with bad boy kids”, there is less need for my tax dollars to support them and their children.

      I will say that the authors of these articles sound as “gamma” as you can get. There is no personal accountability from the authors at all.

      I remember a young FatB’Stard who had the opportunity to date “nice girls” but he managed to fuck up those opportunities. Many times these lost opportunities in his youth were due to being clueless about signs of attraction, or not having enough balls (being too shy) to take a chance and pursue a nice girl. As he got older he missed out on many nice girls because he was busy lusting after the club slut like everyone else. He was too stupid to see that the difference between the nice girl and the club slut was often a push up bra, skin tight clothing, and applying makeup with a trowel.

      The nice girls are out there for the men who want to spend the time to find them. The alternative is to be a bitch and write articles like the one you posted.

      Have a nice day :-).

    • Frank95 says:

      This story that women date bad boys till they’re 30, then look for good guys to marry is a myth.

      It’s perpetuated by losers with high opinions of themselves. But before you get upset, let me explain.

      Loser dude with excessively high opinion of self sees women rejecting him. Because he has this high and undeserved opinion of himself, rather than admitting that he’s a loser, rationalises that she’s making a mistake. She’s not. She’s actually choosing someone better.

      Now come age 30, the loser women out there are getting desperate, so they approach loser guys. Of course, by now these losers are used to not getting sex. Furthermore, they’ve been waiting for twelve or more years for this, they can finally reject someone themselves.

      Hope it was worth the wait boys?

      • Fundude says:

        Cool story old man.

        Keep paying that top dollar for platonic relationships while begging to bang some guy’s wife

      • Frank95 says:

        Lemme give yers an example FD/FB.

        Just imagine some loser who hasn’t had a real gf. So, when challenged to provide a pic, has to get a pic with some random girl at a table, who isn’t even looking at the camera, and the hand on his shoulder is not from the girl in the pic, but someone cropped from the photo on the right. The loser can’t even afford Photoshop.

        Such a guy’s only defence mechanism is to rationalise. Poor bastard.

      • Fundude says:

        @Frank

        Its almost as bad as some old dud that is pretending to have a his own plane with a wait staff attending him while just sitting in a regular plane.

      • Jaybird923 says:

        Fundude you should have kept that to yourself lol

      • FatB'StardSA says:

        @Frank95

        Is you hypothesis based on personal experience? Were you the loser with high opinions of himself?

  154. Fundude says:

    Interesting information concerning passive vs active fund management as per top economics such as Eugene Fama of the University of Chicago:

    {{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqa-jSuXmYw}}

  155. Another Anonymous says:

    @ KnownAim

    Well you told us, what punishment you suggest for run away dads. What do you suggest for moms who do not respect the court ordered time the child is supposed to spend with his/her dad?

  156. Cryptic Anomaly says:

    @Zach “This is my scale:

    Minimal = Hookers (= no)
    Practical = Somewhat attractive but has something more also that makes her interesting to me
    Moderate = Extremely attractive and has something more also that makes her interesting to me
    Substantial = No, unless I’m married to her.
    High = Same as above”

    Interesting, here is my take.

    This is my scale:

    Minimal = Usually a sweet girl next door type who is more interested in the upmarket dating than trying to be a career SB. Also usually better looking than the ones who want more and far more pleasant to chat with and spend time with.
    Practical = Much the same as above.
    Moderate = Usually women who already have well paid careers or women who feel they can get more buck for their bang.
    Substantial = Many are escorts, all are high maintenance and provide substantial amounts of drama. I don’t care that they are asking for Substantial but I do find it amusing that they can’t work out that the more you ask for the more you should deliver not just sexually but also in terms of being stress free company.
    High = As above times 100.

    In all categories looks and age don’t play a part. I have seen hot 18 year olds asking for minimum and jaded post wall 50 plus year olds and fat women demanding substantial and high.

    • Fundude says:

      I have also seen janitors win the lottery for 100 million dollars.

      Shit, janitors have an equal shot at success as an Ivy league/University of Chicago/Standard MBA!

      • Cryptic Anomaly says:

        A janitor has more chance, the world needs cleaning more than it needs over qualified muppets who studied subjects that no one cares about.

      • Cryptic Anomaly says:

        In fact a janitor would have a great time pumping some of these SB’s who are desperately trying to work out how they will pay off their degree in Tibetan Female Folk Dancing.

      • Fundude says:

        @Cryptic

        LOL I agree but those “muppets” are making more than ever if you look at salary numbers.

        Consultants at Bain/McKinsey/Boston are making a killing for their “knowledge”

      • Cryptic Anomaly says:

        I agree with you FD, but the people working for the high end places are a very small percentage of ones who earned the same degrees and are now dancing on tables or driving cabs.

      • Fundude says:

        @Cryptic

        Dunno about that at top MBAs

        {{http://poetsandquants.com/2014/11/24/salaries-offers-up-at-chicago-booth/}}

        They are basically starting at Family Practice salaries the FIRST year out from their MBA.

        {{https://managementconsulted.com/consulting-jobs/2016-management-consulting-salaries-undergraduate-mba-interns/}}

    • Anonymous says:

      There’s no such thing as upmarket dating on SA. Mainly because there’s no dating involved. I mean, who in their right mind is trying to find a wife or a husband on here?

  157. Fundude says:

    Mitt Romney on his consulting firm “Bain”, one of the big three.

    {{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZrV8Wb1Dhk}}

    What do you people think about consulting? Is it mostly a pyramid scheme where they churn and burn associates?

  158. Another Anonymous says:

    @ Anonymous at 9.33

    Your line item #3 is clearly wrong. There is at least one Miss “Your Country” winner here, she will compete internationally next month, we met before and we are touring Austria together in May.

    Another anonymous d.b.a. DFE #6

  159. Fundude says:

    Some beta faggot threatened me on the sugar forum site lol

    When you read his posts, the faggot pays some low level whore over 10K to get some action.

    I would fuck his sister and gf for free.

    • Anonymous says:

      How do you know he’s fucking some low volume whore, and what does that even mean, maybe you meant quality? Literacy is not a hard thing.

    • KnownAim says:

      As long as you don’t cry big tears laters when his mates smash up your car, place and balls ….

    • if I was a married congressman with 4 kids and with BDSM tendencies would I then pay $10k per month to any woman . half that would be hush money . a single guy no matter how ugly paying more than the going rate for a h00ker is a chump

      • Fundude says:

        The dude is some 46 y/o beta nerd.

        He’s nothing to worry about lol

      • Fundude says:

        ” How many first dates? 5
        How many progressed to a second. 1
        Any relationships. Yes. I’m in solid arrangement with a great woman
        Your favorite date. Hiking date in a secluded location. The views were great and the sex even better.
        How many were from this/any sub – if any were. None.
        How many times did you get tested? None. I’m going to do this soon.
        How much money did you spend ? Probably 10k or more. All of it on the current arrangement.
        How many drunk messages/texts did you send that you immediately regret the next morning? A couple. She sent a couple too.
        How many times were you recognized in public? Twice. One time was across the restaurant. We bailed. The second time was a little harder.”

      • baby monkey says:

        What is that picture? hahahahahahahaha

      • Anonymous says:

        Going rate for a hooker for a SB? Then why are you here dear, please by all means don’t infect SA with your AIDS ridden ass, go to your local brothel and get your drug fix too while you’re at it. A single guy who is a fucking 50 year old man yeah he better pay substantial or he’s going nowhere. Why would anyone accept a single guy who has no long term intentions but to pump and dump for a few months, for minimal or even practical? You’re disgusting, fuck off.

    • IHF2030 says:

      Some of these women cause the beta males to come out of the woodwork.

  160. single moms and strippers should not be allowed to use the site at all because they are worth less than minimal. however single moms are easier to scam as they are usually pretty desperate .

    • KnownAim says:

      Are you saying you are as good as a run away dad? Personally I am in favour of castration for those types. Slice up the sausage and put some salt on it ….

  161. Fundude says:

    Just checked out the reddit sugar site.

    Some dude “malibijones” seems to make all of the new posts lol Its deader than a doornail over there.

    I guess sugar just isn’t an interesting enough topic to attract many people to discuss it anywhere lol

  162. rembodler says:

    There is absolutely nothing wrong with putting Substantial or High in her expectations. There are maybe 40-50 profiles in my area who have that. Mostly either new older average looking women or fairly attractive young ones. The young ones have been on the site as long as I recall, logging in at least a few times a week.
    They are probably looking for that young Dubai millionaire. If they do not see one in their mailbox, they keep waiting. I think this is absolutely harmless activity, why get one’s panties in a twist about it…no clue.

    • of course there is nothing wrong with it. I’m sure they will be waiting a while until they become the next Elaine. secondly if I was a Dubai billionaire I wouldn’t stick with 1 woman for more than 3 months .

      • Anonymous says:

        You know there are millionsires besides Arabs right? And lastly, no woman who id young is wanting to make this a career, you either get what you want or stop looking. People aren’t starving you know.

      • Anonymous 1313 says:

        Actually they are. That’s why most of them come here.

    • rembodler says:

      It just depends on what you want. If you want a steady sugar, that is probably a poor strategy. If you just think of it as playing a lottery, that is ok too. People win lottery. Just not everyone who buys a ticket…

      • KnownAim says:

        Being on this site does not cost anything, you know …. for a SB …. sure someone like real dave is welcome to pay in any case 😀

  163. Anonymous says:

    DANGER…. A REAL Sweetheart is back..25 yr old Kansas City. Violent,robbed me after spraying me with mace….DANGER

  164. Anonymous says:

    This has become a sausage fest, you homos. I’m outta here.

  165. Promise says:

    Speaking of Let’s Talk Sugar whatever happened to that series?

  166. let’s talk sugar …. 95% of women on this site who list substantial and high as their desired expectation should move to Dubai to get that .
    the true scale :

    nice athletic body or thin = minimal
    if you were the hottest chick in your high school class ,
    college cheerleader ,
    local fitness model = minimal to practical

    you won the your state pageant , miss Nevada , miss Michigan and you have near pornstar skills = moderate

    super model = substantial
    super model + experienced mistress for married senators or professional athletes = high

    you’re welcome

    • Anonymous says:

      1. You’re an idiot. Just because you’re poor, doesn’t mean others are. The site explicitly says rich older guys, meaning millionaires, not people who live on wages and food stamps.

      2. Why would a thin hot girl date a very much older guy for minimal? Lol, that is delusional. Only girls who have had enough of the cc do that. Women who care about who they’re letting into their bodies would probably go for the high expectation, thus being smart too, not just beautiful.

      3. There are no celebs here, no Miss peagent winners, no one who can be easily recognized. Why? Because they have a hot rich young billionaire from Dubai as you mentioned as their boyfriend and potential husband, not as a sugar daddy.

      4. There are many models here, what are you talking about? I am not talking about the instagram models, but those who walk pageants. And not all are located in the US so maybe you should broaden your freaking horizon.

      5. This one is the dumbest of them all, you have truly outdone yourself. WHO in their right fucking mind would want a supermodel who famous senators and other athletes have fucked? No one wants ‘sexual experienced’ women anything. Maybe you wanted to write VIRGIN instead.
      You’re an idiot.

      • there are , from what I’ve heard , maybe 5 super models on this site . they deserve high or substantial
        . there are NOT many models here . bikini models at biker bars don’t count. you keep calling me an idiot yet you keep replying to my posts . perhaps becuase you’re on the same level as idiots :) as fatbastard says ”
        have a nice day !”

    • Zach says:

      This is my scale:

      Minimal = Hookers (= no)
      Practical = Somewhat attractive but has something more also that makes her interesting to me
      Moderate = Extremely attractive and has something more also that makes her interesting to me
      Substantial = No, unless I’m married to her.
      High = Same as above

      • Zach says:

        Let me add one more thing about minimal. Sometimes I’ve noticed that girls who are new will mistakenly put minimal. I didn’t mean to call those girls hookers. They are just new and not aware to stay out of that level.

    • KnownAim says:

      @ Dave, it is all bullocks, I happen to observe what HINWI wives actually look like.

    • KnownAim says:

      As in short, fat, a touch old, as in really old ….. if a guy wants to play = he has to pay. That is all. No one is aiming to be a budget substitute for a short, fat, old wifey who is rolling in it.

  167. WTF says:

    omg omg omg and it is still the same shit in here , guys guys guys girls girls girls this is an adult blog not a 5th grade class so can be please talk about some sd/sb experiences ??

  168. dear anonymous . my SB from this site just sent me a text asking me to hang out with her and her friends tonight , no shopping , no money involved just a party at her friends apartments . so does this still count as her using me for my money and being forced to hang out with a creepy “rapist” ?

  169. Another Anonymous says:

    @ FunDude

    Brother do not leave me out just because I was off signal for a week.

    • Anonymous says:

      So you’d like to join the troll gang all on your own huh?

    • Fundude says:

      6) Another Anonymous

      Damn, the crew is a older feminist destroying machine.

      Im proud of you guys.

      • and we should call ourselves the delusional female eradicators

      • Anonymous says:

        Good job, you are doing all of this on a sugar site. Seriously surprised SA’s staff hasn’t intervened yet. You have some nerve.

      • KnownAim says:

        @ Anon, they can’t do it on any other site, as ladies on other sites have even less reason to suck up to useless d*cks. On other sites they would have to promise to lick, suck and cook wonderful dinners.

      • KnownAim says:

        For the avoidance of any doubt I meant the likes of FD, RD and the fat bastard would have to list licking, sucking and cooking amonst their skills …..

  170. FatB'StardSA says:

    It seems the complaint is that 4-5 crazy trolls are ruining the blog.

    1. @FunDude
    2. @Dave
    3. @FatB’StardSA
    4. ?
    5. ?

    Who are the other 2 trolls?

  171. FedUpAnon says:

    Another 16 year old on SA, I think school as the occupation would have given it away? Don’t they read these profiles?

  172. Fundude says:

    Good video on gender dynamics

    [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpEFiQ3uiHw&ebc=ANyPxKqYkvJNOUTH_gakcHTsWWj_Umt5_1hW-GnD_1ur8K3cgHsiFWbT9Iz-OXTVWPbv6A1lVdzOCu9VD8rX04tpGkv6nBQ3IA]]

  173. the rise of Donald Trump is due to the breakdown of society , liberalism , which has feminism as a subset . best to learn how to make sandwiches and run on a treadmill you so called females . your game will be up soon .

  174. sister says:

    lmbo guys lets all get along

  175. Anonymous says:

    lmbo guys lets all et along

  176. Promise says:

    I think I see why FunDude, and Dave hate feminists now. D: “http://ageofshitlords.com/feminist-webcam-porn-performer-assaults-a-man-for-calling-out-her-hypocrisy/”

  177. rembodler says:

    I think both sides – and let’s not call them “SBs” / “SDs” – since we are being told that “there no real SDs or SBs here” – IMHO, both sexes are equally guilty in name calling and getting personal. IMHO, suspecting people to be the opposite sex from what they themselves state to be got really out of control.
    At least you can say say “$hit” or “f*ck” and not being erased by some prude…and that is priceless. Here used to be a good place – although not always very diplomatic – and it will be sad to see it go.

    • Aurore Dupin says:

      You are right Rembod, f*ck this $hit! I don’t know why that YGBKM person started bitching about me. I think she hates natural blondes,me and Scarlett Johansson, lol. YGTBK, you are a fat miserable biotch who cannot get a man to f8ck you.

      • rembodler says:

        Hahaha… Aurore. You know, I have to apologize; maybe you are really a woman. Just not a very smart one…;-)).

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        lol…youre funny.

        I take it you no longer want to meet?

        I was going to buy donuts for you to shove into your bearded face.

        No donuts for you now, Mr. Dupin.

      • Anonymous says:

        Scarlett isn’t a ‘natural blonde’ stupid slut, research her 90’s pics. And really, who is jealous of ugly pale blondes? Angelina Jolie or Monica Bellucci all the way.

    • Aurore Dupin says:

      Whateva, Rembod. I am just lowering myself to your level. You want a stupid bitchy blonde, here I am. You yourself said I am too smart to be a woman. Now you say because I am dumb, I must be a woman. I cannot win, can I? Really, I do not care. this is just a stupid blog. I thought you are better than most men here. Sorry, I was wrong. You are juts as presumptuous as the rest of them.

      • rembodler says:

        Wow…wow. now I really have to apologize!
        Aurore…I really hope you are a woman, since what you wrote ^^^ gave me a hard-on. Now I would hate for you to be a man…;-((.

      • Aurore Dupin says:

        Sorry, Remmo.
        I am all man, with a scrotum and a 5 o’clock shadow.
        And you are now hopelessly gay…☺

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        true story

      • rembodler says:

        YGTBK…and you know this…how?

      • rembodler says:

        YGTBK – are you, by any chance, Aurore Dupin?
        That was my original guess…Aurore is your proxy. I just had no idea why would you make that character.

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        Ha. ^^^Most inconceivable comment to date. And quite questionable, actually.

        Not even gonna bother with this one.

        You suck, rem.

        Will leave you and Aurore to wallow about in your own loneliness.

      • Anonymous says:

        YGBKM come over to reddit.

      • yougottabekiddingme says:

        @Anon… Thank you for the invite.

        It amazes me to what insatiable extremes people will go to turn this place into a circus. Once I get completely exhausted of the nonsense here, Ill likely just stop posting all together.

        The weekend and much of next week is pretty busy for me, so I wont likely be around anyway. Maybe this place will be more palatable in the weeks to come.

        I talk with a couplefew SBs and SDs offline from time to time. Actually prefer interactions with genuine people who actually have something interesting and intelligent to share. Youre welcome to email me :)

        yougottabekiddingme2014 at g m a i l

      • Anonymous says:

        Thanks, will do so. :)

    • Anonymous says:

      It’s not being prude, but saying curse words really adds no value to the posts and is probably bad because this is a public forum, and anyone can read it. Is that the impression you’d like to leave?

      • rembodler says:

        Poor prude…obviously never stayed late enough to watch an adult comedy show? Go on a cruise and listen to some of the comedians. You need to work on your sense of humor…

      • Anonymous says:

        Learn what the word prude means first, don’t be ignorant and while you’re at it check that word too. If you’re using it as an ad hominem then you’re no better.

      • rembodler says:

        @Idiot above:
        Merriam Webster Dictionary:
        Simple Definition of “prude”
        a person who is easily shocked or offended by things that do not shock or offend other people
        Examples of “prude” in a sentence
        The racy sitcom frequently satirizes exactly the sort of prude who would like to see the show taken off the air.

      • Anonymous says:

        Nope, google tells me otherwise:

        a person who is or claims to be easily shocked by matters relating to sex or nudity.

        Example: I never knew a boy to be such a prude.

      • rembodler says:

        As I said, you are an idiot, TVC. Always were, always are, always will be.

      • Anonymous says:

        I am not TVC you idiot, I just told you what google search lends you once you type that word. It is explicitly related to sexual nuances and nudity. Read a fucking book!

      • rembodler says:

        Whatever you say, @TVC

      • KnownAim says:

        Lol. Apparently swearing a lot is a sign of superior intelligence, according to some research 😉

      • Anonymous says:

        TVC has migrated not long ago from this blog along with the others. I suggest you go too.

  178. @ anonymouse . yes I forced the woman sitting to my right to take a picture with me In a public bar outside with dozens of people around us . yup you’re right .

    • Anonymous says:

      Not physically forced you idiot. Almost everyone has been placed in the arkward position of being forced into taking pictures with some insistent loser. And that’s what that picture looks like that’s not how a woman touch a man she into…

      • it was a friends with benefits situation , no PDA involved . sounds like no man wants to be in a picture with you , I’m sorry maybe you should ask a priest 😉

      • Anonymous says:

        they both go through great lengths not to touch beyond what is necessary. Notice how they pull the body away from you. Plus based off of your own pose it clear neither of these woman are someone you have anything but a passing association with. But keep telling your lies everyone is allowed a fantasy life

      • yup anonymouse I’m still a Virgin and my kid was born immaculately .. I’ve never been laid . I live in fantasy world . maybe you should analyze why you’re not in the picture . don’t be a hater :)

      • Anonymous says:

        A picture with a rapist who has a creep factor is nothing to be proud of. Well, unless you earn that 800k a year salary.

      • rape ! rape ! keep crying rape … it just diminishes actual REAL rape . you’re only hurting yourself ms liberal .

      • Anonymous says:

        Actual rape has already been diminished by ‘divorce rape’ and ‘mind rape’.

  179. Anonymous says:

    Only because this happened once to @ Dave & @ Fundude

    {{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uLI6BnVh6w}}, I guess this is what you refuse to tell your “man following”, eh? …That you actually got put “OUT” of a car by a female.

    It is ok bro, we are all subject to find a fine piece of pie and then lose them. So move on and find the next one. Stop wallowing in how bad women are in general if you are happy with your 23 yr old. Mind check.

    • We are not whining .there are many ways a man can get laid . escorts , h00kers, Hitting on 100 women to get 1, marriage , foreign sex tourism, SA , etc . the problem is that we are wise enough to want to settle down with one woman becuase we don’t want to be 55 and ask for the damnvapid colon combo. problem with that is 99% of women are worthless . in debt , slutty past , emotional problems , sexual problems , SS feminazi gestapo graduates . the quality of western women has dropped to street trash level . look at the posters on the blog . old yeller Elaine and refund gap with her bra pic . yeah that’s classy .

      • Fundude says:

        lol so true

      • Anonymous says:

        As I suspected. I got under your skin. Cool, at least you know that since that is your professing of women and all that is left for you to wade through (pun intended), then at least you know what you are working with. I suggest you wear a neon vest while on the street picking up the trash so that no one runs you over or misses seeing you with their lack of eye wear since they cannot afford it. You know, because they are not classy enough to have the funds to buy glasses. You said it, so I wish you luck in walking in it.

        Have a nice day!

      • Anonymous says:

        Of course the idiot in the cheap thrift store boxers and the scum that’s posting pictures of women on a public forum for attention are examples of class

      • you asked a question . I answered . that’s all

  180. Anonymous says:

    oh look,

    It is @ Dave & @ Fundude, lmao.

    {{https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yF2C6KuN328}}

    • Fundude says:

      What the fuck is that feminist garbage?

      • Anonymous says:

        It is called you in Cameo being exactly who you are on the blog. Or, do you take another stance here? Correct me if I am wrong, but Mr. Feminatzi, that is all you subscribe to.

      • Anonymous says:

        lmao, “cameo” .. isn’t that the truth. haha, correct word is: “Camo”

        You know me. No habla espanol, a la no comprende, me de student.

  181. IHF2030 says:

    This blog is not as entertaining as it used to be, I must say.

    • Fundude says:

      Unfortunately, this place was dominated by low quality older SBs who called everyone “racist” and “sexist”.

      Thank God they left here for reddit.

      The reddit site is pretty useless as well though, you can check it out. Its really not active.

      The SDs ultimately say the same stuff as we do here, just “nicer”.

      I have yet to see them demanding BBWs, older women, platonic SBs, etc.

      • Jaybird923 says:

        You’re an idiot some SDs did disagree with you you did what you do best try to insult them, twist their words around, or pretend to have selective amnesia.

      • Fundude says:

        @Jay

        Which ones? I have already linked many posts from that reddit confirming that the vast majority of SDs ultimately agree with my position as “ideal”

        It was only the older angry women like usual.

      • Anonymous says:

        It’s not inactive they have like 10 threads a day.
        At least they don’t troll the site with useless feminist videos and rants, and are actual SD’s who have been in arrangements.

      • Fundude says:

        @Anon

        The “10 threads” a day are posted by about 4 posters with almost no comments.

        Its very inactive overall

      • I would rather beat off than have to “pay” for the company of any woman over the age of 30; well put fun dude .

      • Anonymous says:

        Where does pressing your moniker lead us to Dave? Is it your profile?

      • Anonymous says:

        Hey Dave,

        If that is your “girl” in the pic there with you…shouldn’t she be giving you head right now instead of you writing on this blog? Oh, and if you dare try to get cocky with it and say, “why, that happens to be what she is doing to me now”, we will negate that answer with a quickness. Because if she was any good at it, bro fo, then you wouldn’t be able to type while in progress.

      • anonymouse , don’t ever touch my moniker . that’s rape ! rape ! I’ll cry rape !

      • that’s not “my girl” that was a summer fling, a friend set me up with . she’s 32. I don’t take anyone over the age of 25 seriously . they are just a good time. however with the right SA girl who can be convinced this site will lead her nowhere , I’d get married again , with a prenup that is .

      • Anonymous says:

        I cringe that anyone would try and touch, better yet, even reach towards your moniker. You either have deep pockets and keep that tidbit of info in your pocket that you shell it out to pretend to cry rape because you paid so much to your girl in order for you to be able to play the game in the bedroom. And, that’s all cool bro.

        As long as you come with it and bring the whole truth and the whole story to the blog. Otherwise, you are depleting the witness(es) and the courtroom of any affiliates left that care or care to read.

      • Anonymous says:

        What was “wrong” with her Dave? Why was she not long term dating material? Why was SHE not dating material? A FRIEND set you up, not SA, nor the SA blog. What made you drop her after summer? Or, did she drop you?

      • you believe whatever you want . are you interested in me ? sounds like it . any woman over the age of 30 has an smv of at most zero . after age 30 it starts entering negative territory.

      • Anonymous says:

        Dave is a fucking liar. He didn’t have a fling with anyone in that picture. Just look at herbody language she’s only tolerating touching him because she had to lean in to take the picture that he probably forced on them. So he could post it here and pretend. Pathetic loser…

      • Anonymous says:

        Why would anyone marry Dave with a prenup? You don’t even make enough to warrant a prenup, prenup’s get thrown off in courts all the time, and why the hell are you looking for a wife on SA? No one under 25 is going to want to marry a 42 year old without some kind of benefit, unless they want to lower their status.

  182. Anonymous says:

    For all the ladies who like a project…

    [http://newyork.craigslist.org/mnh/m4w/5463256761.html]

  183. Fundude says:

    Why is Elaine on Facebook complaining about her SDs?

    {{https://www.facebook.com/MaximBady/videos/1029229557119493/}}

  184. Fundude says:

    That reddit sugar dating site is literally dead in terms of activity. The same moderator dude made 3 posts in a row with almost no responses to any of them.

    The mods appear to make about 90% of the posts there with only maybe 8 contributors.

    This place is more active than that shithole lol

    I wish they would do a message board type of format for SA though. That is the only positive.

  185. Catcher 22 says:

    I am hereby petitioning SA to hire @Fundude’s favorite Reddit feminazi bitch moderator to come on over here to the SA blog and moderate the fvkking hell out of @Fundude, @Dave and the whole gang of ass**le Anonymouses who have brought this blog down to its present sorry, forlorn state by driving away all the intelligent and interesting posters during the past several months.

    Correction: I should have said “by driving away ALMOST all of the intelligent and interesting posters” @Jay is still here. ?

    • FatB'StardSA says:

      @Catcher 22

      Being a catcher rather than a pitcher explains your desire to side with a feminazi over @FunDude.

      I pledge to renew my membership if SA does indeed hire a feminazi to moderate the blog in order to complain to SA management that a feminazi is abusing a paid SA member (which would be me).

      I am sure SA will side with the people who pay their bills.

      Have a nice day :-).

    • Fundude says:

      Betas cucks gonna cuck

    • A Nonnymouse says:

      It would be simpler just to move to the reddit forum, and leave the losers having nobody listening to them, as happens in real life.

      At the moment, it’s a bunch of guys nobody listens to talking to an audience of 1, JayBird, or an occasional poster. Like nobody listens to them outside.

      Speaking of JayBird. You ought to consider trying again at reddit. If you think what a moderator over there would make of the stupidity here, it is understandable that they are being excessively twitchy. Give them time to sort out the dills, work out who is ok, and who not, lurk for a bit over there, and then join in. Their concerns are real, given the fact that this place is now dead.

      No matter how hard you try, you’re not going to get through to the people here that people would rather leave the forum than listen to them…like in real life. It must be lonely being dickheads like that. Still if talking to nobody, and being listened to by nobody satisfies them….

      • Jaybird923 says:

        I’ll pass. Being twitchy. I understand but that’s not what happened example.

        “You as a moderator, reprimanded her publicly. I respectfully point out that there was nothing personal in what she said. In fact, the response “It’s pretty easy actually since I’m attracted to money!” is a great response that shows another point of view.
        I know a moderator’s job is not easy, and there is particular sensitivity about the tone of the SA blog infecting the discussion here, but I wanted to give my support to Elaine here, irrespective of the consequences. I would have done this privately, except that you chose to do this publicly.”

        Moderator response :

        “You want a space where you can do whatever you want? By all means! Create your own space! No one is stopping you!
        I just spent two hours, of my limited, personal time this afternoon, trying to straighten this place up after the influx of new users causing chaos. I try to remain as professional as possible, but to get responses like this? If the new users do not like the way this well established community is run, by all means no one is keeping you”